Citation: | SUN Shiqiang,CHEN Cuihua,ZHAO Wenhao,et al. Typomorphic Characteristics of Germanium-Enriched Sphalerite Minerals and the Substitution Mechanism of Germanium from Wusihe in Southwestern Margin of the Yangtze Block[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis,2025,44(2):212−227. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202406210138 |
The Wusihe lead-zinc deposit, situated at the southwestern margin of the Yangtze Block and a prominent Ge-enriched deposit within the Sichuan—Yunnan—Guizhou lead-zinc metallogenic province, faces ongoing debates regarding its genesis. The influence of sphalerite typomorphic characteristics on Ge enrichment and substitution mechanisms within the deposit remains a crucial puzzle to unravel. To address this, our study employs quantitative analyses using microspectrophotometry and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Results reveal the presence of two sphalerite stages during the hydrothermal period: a darker Stage I and a lighter Stage II. Despite similar mean values for visual reflectance and the dominant wavelength of reflectance color, the mean reflectance color saturation differs (0.048 and 0.043, respectively), with corresponding average Ge contents of 244×10−6 and 43.2×10−6. The experimental outcomes conclude that Ge exists in sphalerite as isomorphism and is more concentrated in sphalerite with higher reflectance color saturation. The substitution of Ge is related to Cu and Ag, with two stages of Ge4++2Cu+ ↔ 3Zn2+, Ge4++2 (Cu, Ag)+↔ 3Zn2+. The ore-forming temperature is medium to low, classifying the deposit as a Mississippi Valley-type lead-zinc deposit. The BRIEF REPORT is available for this paper at http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.ykcs.202406210138.
Significance: Germanium (Ge) is widely used in important fields such as semiconductors,infrared optics,optical fibers,polymerization catalysts,and medicine,due to its excellent thermal conductivity,electrical conductivity,high refractive index,and low dispersion properties[1-2]. Notably,nearly three-quarters of industrial Ge worldwide is sourced from sphalerite in lead-zinc deposits[3-4]. The mineralogical typomorphic characteristics of sphalerite can often effectively reflect the formation environment and genetic type of the deposit[5-6]. Therefore,conducting deep research on the enrichment mechanism of Ge in lead-zinc deposits and the typomorphic features of Ge-enriched sphalerite is not only significant for further understanding the mineralization patterns of Ge-enriched lead-zinc deposits but also holds practical value for the exploration and development of Ge resources. The Wusihe lead-zinc deposit,located on the southwestern edge of the Yangtze block,is an important lead-zinc polymetallic deposit in the Sichuan—Yunnan—Guizhou metallogenic belt. Experts and scholars have gained a deep understanding of its metallogenic geological background[13],sources of metallogenic materials[14-15],characteristics of metallogenic fluids[14,16],petrogeochemical features[14-16],and deposit genesis[13-18]. Luo Kai et al.[22] also discovered differential enrichment of Ge in sphalerite from different stages within this deposit. Whether the typomorphic characteristics of sphalerite affect the enrichment of Ge remains worthy of further investigation. Additionally,there are still two differing views on the genesis of the Wusihe lead-zinc deposit: one as a sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX) deposit[13] and the other as a Mississippi Valley-type (MVT) deposit[14,16-18]. Therefore,focusing on the research on the typomorphic characteristics of Ge-enriched sphalerite and the genesis of the deposit in this area,this paper primarily adopts two testing methods: microscopic spectrophotometry and LA-ICP-MS. Microscopic spectrophotometry can obtain mineral reflectance,visual reflectance,dominant reflectance wavelength,reflectance saturation,and other characteristics within millimeters,featuring high efficiency and convenience. In geological research,the application of microscopic spectrophotometry is mainly for determining the reflectance of organic matter vitrinite in strata,with less frequent use in measuring the reflectance of metallic minerals. Furthermore,the microscopic spectrophotometer used in this test has a beam spot size reaching the micrometer level,which can match the beam spot size of in-situ composition tests such as LA-ICP-MS. By using microscopic spectrophotometry to test the color (body color) typomorphic features of Ge-enriched sphalerite,we obtain the reflectance color index characteristics of Ge-enriched sphalerite,including visual reflectance (Rvis),dominant reflectance wavelength (λd),and mean reflectance saturation (Pe). LA-ICP-MS testing technology is a commonly used method for testing trace elements in mineral micro-zones,characterized by high spatial resolution,low detection limits,and low operating costs. By utilizing LA-ICP-MS to test the trace element typomorphic features of Ge-enriched sphalerite,we then quantitatively analyze the elemental content characteristics of Mn,Cu,Ga,Ge,Ag,Cd,In,Pb,Fe,etc. Finally,a comparative analysis is conducted on the two types of data.
Methods: The experimental samples were primarily sourced from the Wusihe lead-zinc deposit located on the north bank of the Dadu River. Based on field geological investigations,systematic sampling was conducted in mining areas 1,2,5,and 12 (as shown in Fig.1c). The preparation of thin sections and probe slices was completed at the Rock and Mineral Testing Center of the Hebei Geological Survey and Mapping Institute,with the thin sections polished to dimensions of 3.7cm×2.6cm×0.6cm and the probe slices to a thickness of 150μm. Microscopic observations of the thin sections and probe slices were performed at the Comprehensive Rock and Mineral Identification Laboratory of the College of Earth and Planetary Sciences,Chengdu University of Technology,using a NiKon LV100POL polarized light microscope equipped with a NiKon DS-Ri2 imaging system. In-situ spectrophotometric analysis of sphalerite was conducted at the National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Development Engineering,Chengdu University of Technology. The spectrophotometric testing system used was the Axio Scope.A1 high-resolution microscope equipped with polarized light analysis (A Pol) functionality,jointly produced by Carl Zeiss GmbH and J&M,and paired with the &MSP 400 spectral measurement system. The light source model was HBO 100,and the light-receiving element was a photomultiplier tube containing multiple curved-surface shaped dynodes,an anode,and a cathode,capable of measuring mineral particles as small as 0.5μm under high magnification. The test beam spot was set to 20μm×20μm. The laboratory used double-layered light-blocking curtains,with an outer layer of light blue and an inner layer of red-black,and the light source model was HBO 100,to subtract spectral interference. Before testing,all polished sample surfaces were re-polished using diamond spray (grain size W=1μm). The spectrophotometer was turned on,and after the instrument stabilized (30 minutes),standard sample calibration and sensitivity adjustments were performed. During testing,the standard sample was recalibrated every 15 minutes,and the standard sample parameters are listed in Table 1. Quantitative calculation of reflectance was performed using the “Selective Wavelength Coordinate Method for Average Daylight” as described by Hardy et al[24]. LA-ICP-MS in-situ trace element content testing was completed at Wuhan Shangpu Analysis Technology Co.,Ltd. The GeolasPro laser ablation system consisted of a COMPexPro 102 ArF 193nm excimer laser and MicroLas optical system,manufactured by Teledyne Cetac Technologies,model Analyte Excite. The ICP-MS analyzer used was the Agilent 7700e Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (Agilent Corporation,USA). During laser ablation,helium was used as the carrier gas (370mL/min),and argon as the compensation gas to adjust sensitivity. Both gases were mixed through a T-connector before entering the ICP. The laser ablation system was equipped with a signal smoothing device to maintain the stability of the ablation signal. The laser beam spot and frequency used in this analysis were 32μm and 6Hz,respectively,with an energy density of 3.0J/cm2. The ablation sample signal duration was 40s,the gas background signal duration was 20s,and the washout gas signal duration was 30s. After every 10 test points,1 NIST610 (synthetic silicate glass standard material),and 2 MASS-1 (sulfide standard samples) were added for correction. Quantitative calculation of element mass fractions was performed using the “Internal Standard-Free Matrix Normalization Method” as described by Liu et al [23]. Photographs taken with the polarized light microscope were processed using NIS-Elements BR software; LA-ICP-MS trace element test data were processed using ICPMS DataCal software; and sphalerite reflectance color index test data were processed using Spectra Forensic software. During this testing process,if the relative error of the standard sample minerals was less than 1%,the measured relative error could be controlled within 2%.
Data and Results: The test results of the microspectrophotometer are shown in Table 2,and the test results of LA-ICP-MS are shown in Table 3. In the test results of the microspectrophotometer,the error of visual reflectance is less than 0.3%,the error of the main band of reflection color is less than 1nm,and the error of color saturation is less than 0.001. In the test results of the microspectrophotometer,there is little difference in visual reflectance and the main band of reflection color among different stages of sphalerite,but there is a relatively large difference in color saturation. Compared with Lai et al[6] test on four lead-zinc deposits (Table 4),it also shows the characteristics of little difference in visual reflectance and the main band of reflection color,but a relatively large difference in color saturation,which may be due to the characteristics of sphalerite itself. The detection limit of LA-ICP-MS can reach the ng/g level,with significant differences. Therefore,34S and 57Fe with low natural abundance are used for detection. When measuring the element Ge,the mass spectral peaks of elements such as Zn,Zr,Sm,Nd,Ce,and Sn overlap and cause interference. Specifically,70Zn and 140Ge2+ interfere with 70Ge,144Sm2+ and 144Nd2+ interfere with 72Ge,and 148Sm2+ and 148Nd2+ interfere with 74Ge. Because the content of Sm and Nd in sphalerite samples is generally less than 10μg/g,the interference on 72Ge is relatively small. Moreover,72Ge also has high sensitivity,so 72Ge is selected as the measurement isotope. Other detected elements include 55Mn,63Cu,66Zn,71Ga,107Ag,111Cd,204Pb,206Pb,207Pb,208Pb,etc. The spot size selected for LA-ICP-MS testing is 32μm,which is closer to the spot size (20μm) of the microspectrophotometer,ensuring the accuracy of trace element test results and a higher degree of matching with the test results of the microspectrophotometer.
Reflection color index of sphalerite in different mineral deposits (Data from Lai et al.[6])
Deposit | Statistic | Rvis(%) | λd(nm) | Pe |
Nanmushu | MIN | 16.25 | 474.29 | 0.0257 |
MAX | 17.54 | 479.09 | 0.0404 | |
MEAN | 16.55 | 476.40 | 0.0375 | |
Zhaxikang | MIN | 16.45 | 476.54 | 0.0381 |
MAX | 16.96 | 477.86 | 0.0455 | |
MEAN | 16.70 | 477.23 | 0.0427 | |
Mengya’a | MIN | 16.89 | 476.89 | 0.0448 |
MAX | 17.40 | 477.86 | 0.0475 | |
MEAN | 17.23 | 477.29 | 0.0462 |
[1] |
刘萧晗, 孟郁苗. “锗”里有奥秘, 观“锗”寻真谛[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2024, 43(2): 467−473. doi: 10.3724/j.issn.1007-2802.20240041
Liu X H, Meng Y M. There is a Mystery in “Germanium”, Observe “Germanium” to Find the True Meaning[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2024, 43(2): 467−473. doi: 10.3724/j.issn.1007-2802.20240041
|
[2] |
赵君, 饶竹, 王鹏, 等. 黑龙江讷河市富锗土壤地球化学特征及影响因素浅析[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(4): 642−651. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202109300139
Zhao J, Rao Z, Wang P, et al. Geochemical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Germanium-Enriched Soils in Nehe City, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(4): 642−651. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202109300139
|
[3] |
叶霖, 韦晨, 胡宇思, 等. 锗的地球化学及资源储备展望[J]. 矿床地质, 2019, 38(4): 711−728. doi: 10.16111/j.0258-7106.2019.04.003
Ye L, Wei C, Hu Y S, et al. Geochemistry of Germanium and Its Resources Reserves[J]. Mineral Deposits, 2019, 38(4): 711−728. doi: 10.16111/j.0258-7106.2019.04.003
|
[4] |
Cugerone A, Cenki-Tok B, Mu M, et al. Behavior of Critical Metals in Metamorphosed Pb-Zn Ore Deposits: Example from the Pyrenean Axial Zone[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2021, 56(4): 685−705. doi: 10.1007/s00126-020-01000-9
|
[5] |
Cook N J, Ciobanu C L, Pring A, et al. Trace and Minor Elements in Sphalerite: A LA-ICPMS Study[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2009, 73(16): 4761−4791. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.05.045
|
[6] |
Lai X, Chen C H, Yang Y L, et al. Constraints on Metallogenic Temperature and Mineralization Style from Reflection Color of Sphalerite[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2023, 161: 105634. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2023.105634
|
[7] |
吴越, 孔志岗, 陈懋弘, 等. 扬子板块周缘MVT型铅锌矿床闪锌矿微量元素组成特征与指示意义: LA-ICP-MS研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(11): 3443−3460. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2019.11.12
Wu Y, Kong Z G, Chen M H, et al. Trace Elements in Sphalerites from the Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Deposits Around the Margins of Yangtze Block and Its Geological Implications: A LA-ICP-MS Study[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2019, 35(11): 3443−3460. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2019.11.12
|
[8] |
温汉捷, 周正兵, 朱传威, 等. 稀散金属超常富集的主要科学问题[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(11): 3271−3291. DOI: 10.18654/1000-0569/2019. 11.01.
Wen H J, Zhou Z B, Zhu C W, et al. Critical Scientific Issues of Super-Enrichment of Dispersed Metals[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2019, 35(11): 3271−3291. DOI: 10.18654/1000-0569/2019. 11.01.
|
[9] |
周家喜, 杨德智, 余杰, 等. 贵州黄丝背斜地区实现大型共(伴)生锗矿床找矿突破[J]. 矿物学报, 2020, 40(6): 772. doi: 10.16461/j.cnki.1000-4734.2020.40.169
Zhou J X, Yang D Z, Yu J, et al. A Breakthrough in Prospecting for Large-Scale Germanium Deposit in the Huangsi Anticline Area, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2020, 40(6): 772. doi: 10.16461/j.cnki.1000-4734.2020.40.169
|
[10] |
韩润生, 吴鹏, 王峰, 等. 论热液矿床深部大比例尺“四步式”找矿方法——以川滇黔接壤区毛坪富锗铅锌矿为例[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(2): 246−257. doi: 10.16539/j.ddgzyckx.2019.02.005
Han R S, Wu P, Wang F, et al. ‘Four Steps Type’ Ore-Prospecting Method for Deeply Concealed Hydrothermal Ore Deposits——A Case Study of the Maoping Zn-Pb- (Ag-Ge) Deposit in Southwestern China[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2019, 43(2): 246−257. doi: 10.16539/j.ddgzyckx.2019.02.005
|
[11] |
韩润生, 吴鹏, 张艳, 等. 西南特提斯川滇黔成矿区富锗铅锌矿床成矿理论研究新进展[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(2): 554−573. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.02.014
Han R S, Wu P, Zhang Y, et al. New Research Progress in Metallogenic Theory for Rich Zn-Pb-(Ag-Ge) Deposits in the Sichuan—Yunnan—Guizhou Triangle (SYGT) Area, Southwestern Tethys[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(2): 554−573. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.02.014
|
[12] |
郑绪忠. 四川乌斯河铅锌矿床地质特征及矿床成因[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2012.
Zheng X Z. Geological Features and Genesis of Wusihe Pb-Zn Deposit, Sichuan[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2012.
|
[13] |
Xiong S F, Gong Y J, Jiang S Y, et al. Ore Genesis of the Wusihe Carbonate-Hosted Zn-Pb Deposit in the Dadu River Valley District, Yangtze Block, SW China: Evidence from Ore Geology, S-Pb Isotopes, and Sphalerite Rb-Sr Dating[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2018, 53(7): 967−979. doi: 10.1007/s00126-017-0776-y
|
[14] |
韦晨, 叶霖, 李珍立, 等. 四川乌斯河铅锌矿床成矿物质来源及矿床成因: 来自原位S-Pb同位素证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(12): 3783−3796. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2020.12.13
Wei C, Ye L, Li Z L, et al. Metal Sources and Ore Genesis of the Wusihe Pb-Zn Deposit in Sichuan, China: New Evidence from in-situ S and Pb Isotopes[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2020, 36(12): 3783−3796. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2020.12.13
|
[15] |
熊索菲, 姚书振, 宫勇军, 等. 四川乌斯河铅锌矿床成矿流体特征及TSR作用初探[J]. 地球科学, 2016, 41(1): 105−120. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2016.008
Xiong S F, Yao S C, Gong Y J, et al. Ore-Forming Fluid and Thermochemical Sulfate Reduction in the Wusihe Lead-Zinc Deposit, Sichuan Province, China[J]. Earth Science, 2016, 41(1): 105−120. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2016.008
|
[16] |
康许浩. 乌斯河铅锌矿床矿物成分特征[J]. 四川有色金属, 2022(1): 10−12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4079.2022.01.004
Kang X H. The Mineral Composition Characteristics of Wusihe Pb-Zn Deposit[J]. Sichuan Nonferrous Metals, 2022(1): 10−12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4079.2022.01.004
|
[17] |
赵文皓, 陈翠华, 康许浩, 等. 四川乌斯河铅锌矿床闪锌矿微量元素特征及其指示意义[J]. 矿物岩石, 2024, 44(2): 62−73. doi: 10.19719/j.cnki.1001-6872.2024.02.05
Zhao W H, Chen C H, Kang X H, et al. Characteristics of Trace Elements in Sphalerite and Its Indicative Significance in Wusihe Deposit, Sichuan Province[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2024, 44(2): 62−73. doi: 10.19719/j.cnki.1001-6872.2024.02.05
|
[18] |
罗开, 周家喜, 徐畅, 等. 四川乌斯河大型锗铅锌矿床锗超常富集特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(9): 2761−2777. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2021.09.10
Luo K, Zhou J X, Xu C, et al. The Characteristics of the Extraordinary Germanium Enrichment in the Wusihe Large-Scale Ge-Pb-Zn Deposit, Sichuan Province, China and Its Geological Significance[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2021, 37(9): 2761−2777. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2021.09.10
|
[19] |
竺成林, 王华建, 叶云涛, 等. 基于原位多元素成像分析龙马溪组笔石成因及地质意义[J]. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(3): 245−259. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201810110113
Zhu C L, Wang J H, Ye Y T, et al. The Formation Mechanism and Geological Significance of Graptolite from the Longmaxi Formation: Constraints from in situ Multi-Element Imaging Analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(3): 245−259. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201810110113
|
[20] |
范晨子, 孙冬阳, 赵令浩, 等. 激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱法微区原位定量分析锂铍矿物化学成分[J]. 岩矿测试, 2024, 43(1): 87−100. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202305310072
Fan C Z, Sun D Y, Zhao L H, et al. In situ Quantitative Analysis of Chemical Composition of Lithium and Beryllium Minerals by Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma-mass Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2024, 43(1): 87−100. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202305310072
|
[21] |
员媛娇, 范成龙, 吕喜平, 等. 电子探针和LA-ICP-MS技术研究内蒙古浩尧尔忽洞金矿床毒砂矿物学特征[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(2): 211−225. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202111240184
Yuan Y J, Fan C L, Lyu X P, et al. Application of EPMA and LA-ICP-MS to Study Mineralogy of Arsenopyrite from the Haoyaoerhudong Gold Deposit, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(2): 211−225. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202111240184
|
[22] |
Hardy A C. Handbook of Colorimetry[J]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1936, 85: 545−546. doi: 10.1126/science.85.2214.545
|
[23] |
Liu Y, Hu Z, Gao S, et al. In situ Analysis of Major And Trace Elements of Anhydrous Minerals by LA-ICP-MS witHout Applying an Internal Standard[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 257(1−2): 34−43. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004
|
[24] |
Wei C, Ye L, Hu Y S, et al. Distribution and Occurrence of Ge and Related Trace Elements in Sphalerite from the Lehong Carbonate-hosted Zn-Pb Deposit Northeastern Yunnan, China: Insights from SEM and LA-ICP-MS Studies[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2019, 115: 103175. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.103175
|
[25] |
Liu G X, Yuan F, Deng Y F, et al. Critical Metal Enrichment in Carbonate-hosted Pb-Zn Systems: Insight from the Chemistry of Sphalerite Within the Hehuashan Pb-Zn Deposit, Middle-Lower Yangtze River Metallogenic Belt, East China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2022, 151: 105209. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.105209
|
[26] |
吉晓佳. 会泽铅锌矿闪锌矿中锗的赋存状态研究和元素替代机制探讨[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2019.
Ji X J. Occurrence of Germanium and Element Alternative Mechanism in Sphalerite from Huize Pb-Zn Deposit[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2019: 1-39.
|
[27] |
李会来, 李凡, 张鼎文, 等. 低温剥蚀LA-ICP-MS准确测定硫化物矿物多元素分析研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2023, 42(5): 970−982. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202308290144
Li H L, Li F, Zhang D W, et al. Multi-Element Accurate Analysis of Sulfide Minerals by Low-Temperature Ablation LA-ICP-MS[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(5): 970−982. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202308290144
|
[28] |
张效瑞, 吴柏林, 雷安贵, 等. 砂岩型铀矿成矿期与非成矿期黄铁矿的微区原位Pb同位素识别特征[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(5): 717−732. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202111300192
Zhang X R, Wu B L, Lei A G, et al. In-situ Micro-Scale Pb Isotope Identification Characteristics of Metallogenic and Non-Metallogenic Pyrites in Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposits[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(5): 717−732. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202111300192
|
[29] |
代堰锫, 余心起, 吴淦国, 等. 北武夷蔡家坪铅锌矿床硫化物特征、矿床成因类型及成矿时代[J] 地学前缘, 2011, 18(2): 321−338.
Dai Y P, Yu X Q, Wu G G, et al. Characteristics of Sulfide Minerals, Genetic Type and Metallogenic Epoch of the Caijiaping Leadzinc Deposit North Wuyi Area, Jiangxi Province[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(2): 321−338.
|
[30] |
Frenzel M, Hirsch T, Gutzmer J. Gallium, Germanium, Indium, and Other Trace and Minor Elements in Sphalerite as a Function of Deposit Type—A Meta-Analysis[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2016, 76: 52−78. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.12.017
|
[31] |
Cave B, Lilly R, Hong W. The Effect of Co-Crystallising Sulphides and Precipitation Mechanisms on Sphalerite Geochemistry: A Case Study from the Hilton Zn-Pb (Ag) Deposit, Australia[J]. Minerals, 2020, 9: 1−22. doi: 10.3390/min10090797
|
[32] |
Oyebamiji A, Hu R Z, Zhao C H, et al. Origin of the Triassic Qilinchang Pb-Zn Deposit in the Western Yangtze Block, SW China: InSights from in-situ Trace Elemental Compositions of Base Metal Sulphides[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2020, 192: 1−21. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2020.104292
|
[33] |
Yang Q Z, Xiao J, Ulrich T, et al. Trace Element Compositions of Sulfides from Pb-Zn Deposits in the Northeast Yunnan and North-West Guizhou Provinces, SW China: Insights from LA-ICP-MS Analyses of Sphalerite and Pyrite[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2022, 141: 1−22. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104639
|
[34] |
Li G M, Zhao Z X, Wei J H, et al. Trace Element Compositions of Galena in an MVT Deposit from the Sichuan—Yunnan—Guizhou Metallogenic Province, SW China: Constraints from LA-ICP-MS Spot Analysis and Elemental Mapping[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2022, 150: 1−20. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.105123
|