• Core Journal of China
  • DOAJ
  • Scopus
  • Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations (CSTPC)
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
ZHAO Linghao,SUN Dongyang,HU Mingyue,et al. Simultaneous Determination of U-Pb Age and Trace Elements of Zircon by Laser Ablation Sector Field Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis,2024,43(1):47−62. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202309110151
Citation: ZHAO Linghao,SUN Dongyang,HU Mingyue,et al. Simultaneous Determination of U-Pb Age and Trace Elements of Zircon by Laser Ablation Sector Field Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis,2024,43(1):47−62. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202309110151

Simultaneous Determination of U-Pb Age and Trace Elements of Zircon by Laser Ablation Sector Field Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry

More Information
  • Received Date: September 10, 2023
  • Revised Date: January 01, 2024
  • Accepted Date: January 14, 2024
  • Available Online: January 16, 2024
  • HIGHLIGHTS
    (1) Simultaneous determination of zircon U-Pb age and multiple trace element contents by LA-SF-ICP-MS can affect the stability of U-Pb isotope signals and ratios, leading to an increased uncertainty in single-analysis U-Pb dating results. However, it has no effect on the accuracy of the concordant ages due to multi-point analysis, and the precision is slightly reduced.
    (2) Simultaneous measurement of zircon U-Pb ages and trace element contents using LA-SF-ICP-MS, yields zircon U-Pb age deviations of less than 1% and deviations in key trace elements such as REE, Ti, Hf, Pb, Th, and U of less than 10%.
    (3) Solely determining zircon U-Pb ages by LA-SF-ICP-MS effectively reduces uncertainty introduced by single-analyses isotope ratio measurement, improving dating precision (2σ<2%) and accuracy (RSE<0.5%).

    Laser ablation sector field inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-SF-ICP-MS) is widely applied in U-Pb dating of zircon due to its remarkable sensitivity. However, the utilization of a magnetic sector mass analyzer imposes constraints on its scanning speeds, potentially affecting the concurrent acquisition of U-Pb isotopes and other trace elements. Here a method for simultaneous zircon U-Pb dating and key trace elements quantifying by LA-SF-ICP-MS were developed. Seven zircon U-Pb standard samples were measured to assess the method's feasibility. Experimental data indicate that simultaneous collection of U-Pb isotopes and other trace elements may decrease signal stability, particularly for low-content isotopes like 207Pb, which in turn leads to an increased age uncertainty and dispersion for single analyses. However, the accuracy of the concordance age and weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of each sample, and the statistical results of all data points, are not affected significantly. Compared to TIMS ages, the discordance in these ages across all samples remains below 1.0% and 0.7%, respectively, meeting the requirements of U-Pb geological dating. Furthermore, the determination of key trace elements in zircon samples shows relative errors to recommended values of less than 10%. LA-SF-ICP-MS can accurately determine both zircon U-Pb ages and trace element contents simultaneously. The BRIEF REPORT is available for this paper at http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.ykcs.202309110151.

    BRIEF REPORT
    Significance: Zircon (ZrSiO4) is a common accessory mineral in both terrestrial and extraterrestrial rocks. It serves as the most frequently utilized mineral in determining the age, origin, and thermal history of rocks through U-Pb geochronology, primarily due to its high closure temperature, resistance to alteration, high uranium content, and minimal incorporation of common lead during its crystallization. Apart from age determination, zircon also provides various geochemical information, including trace elements (Ti, REEs), O isotopes, and Zr isotopes. By combining all these data, it assists in constructing metamorphic P-T-t paths, which helps in inferring the mineral growth history, making it an integral component of “Petrochronology” research[20]. Natural zircon, however, generally exhibits small grains and often possesses intricate internal structural features. Hence, higher analytical spatial resolution and acquiring more in-situ elemental/isotopic information within limited analytical space is crucial.  Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) is a routine technique for zircon U-Pb dating. The sector field mass spectrometer (SF-ICP-MS) possesses high sensitivity, offering possibilities for high spatial resolution U-Pb dating of zircon[28-29] and ultra-low uranium mineral content[21-25, 30]. However, the usage of the magnetic sector mass analyzer results in slower scanning speeds[27]. Consequently, in the reported zircon U-Pb dating by LA-SF-ICP-MS, typically, only U-Pb-ages-related isotopes are detected, and simultaneous quantitative analysis of key trace elements cannot be conducted.  This study optimized instrument parameters and enhanced signal stability to enable simultaneous determination of U-Pb dating alongside quantification of key elements such as Ti, REEs, and Hf. Seven commonly employed zircon U-Pb standard samples were measured to assess the feasibility of the method and its influence on U-Pb dating results.
    Methods: The experiments were carried out at the Key Laboratory of Elemental Microanalysis and Morphology of the China Geological Survey using an ESL NWR 193UC ArF excimer laser and the ELEMENT Ⅱ sector field inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (SF-ICP-MS, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA).
      Helium gas was used as the carrier gas[39], while 1mL/min of nitrogen was introduced to boost instrument sensitivity[40]. A signal homogenization device with higher aerosol diffusion space was utilized to improve signal stability. Laser spot size and frequency were 25μm and 8Hz, respectively, with a laser energy density of 3J/cm2. SF-ICP-MS was employed in low-resolution mode (MM=300), with sensitivity of U about 5000cps/(μg·g-1), and signal stability RSD of 1% to 2%, oxide production rates (ThO+/Th+) below 0.2%. U-Pb isotopes and key trace elements were measured, including 29Si, 49Ti, 89Y, 91Zr, 139La, 140Ce, 141Pr, 146Nd, 147Sm, 151Eu, 157Gd, 159Tb, 163Dy, 165Ho, 166Er, 169Tm, 172Yb, 175Lu, 178Hf, 206Pb, 207Pb, 208Pb, 232Th, and 238U. The measuring time for 206Pb, 208Pb, 232Th, and 238U was 10ms, 207Pb was 20ms, and the remaining elements were 5ms each, resulting in a total measuring time of 0.87s per reading, with an effective analysis time of 71%. Since most zircons contain no, or extremely low, common lead and single-collector mass spectrometry it makes it challenging to accurately measure 204Pb for common lead correction. 202Hg and 204Pb were not detected to improve the proportion of effective analysis time. Detailed instrument operating condition parameters are provided in Table 1.
      The 91500 zircon and NIST610 were used as standard materials for U-Pb isotope ratios and trace element quantitative analysis, respectively. For every 10 unknown sample analyses, a set of standard samples was inserted to correct for fractionation effects. Each spot analysis consisted of a 20s background collection and 40s sample data acquisition and 30s flushing. Raw data were reduced offline using GLITTER 4.0 software package[41]. All samples shared the same signal interval as the standard zircon 91500 for analysis. Age calculations and Concordia diagram construction were performed by Isoplot/Ex version 2.23[42]. The uncertainty for all isotope ratios and age values in this study were reported at a 2σ level.
      Two methods were used to determine zircon U-Pb ages. Method 1: Only U-Pb-related isotopes were measured, including 202Hg, 204Pb, 206Pb, 207Pb, 208Pb, 232Th, and 238U. Single measuring time was 0.306s per reading, and within the 40s sampling time, data for 134 sets of element signal intensities were collected. Method 2: Simultaneous determination of U-Pb ages and trace elements content, including Ti, REE, Hf, and U-Pb isotopes 206Pb, 207Pb, 208Pb, 232Th, 238U, etc. Single measuring time was 0.857s, and within the 40s sampling time, effective signal intensity data for 47 sets were obtained.
    Data and Results: The U-Pb dating results are shown in Fig.1 and Table 2, while the measured trace element contents are presented in Fig.3 and Table 3.
      (1) U-Pb dating results comparison
      Fig.1 provides a visual comparison of precision and accuracy of the results obtained by these two dating methods. It shows that the dating results from Method 1 exhibit smaller errors, and the data points are more concentrated.
      Using LA-SF-ICP-MS with solely U-Pb-related isotope detection, the dating results show an error of 1.5% and 1.3% for 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U, respectively. The consistency of single-point 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U ages is good, with RSD values ranging from 0.2% to 0.9% and 0.5% to 1.3%, respectively. In contrast, when employing Method 2, the errors for 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U ages increase slightly to 1.9% and 1.7%, respectively. The dispersion of single-point ages increases as well, with RSD values for 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U ages ranging from 0.4% to 1.4% and 1.2% to 3.3%, respectively. Particularly, the RSD value for 207Pb/235U ages notably increases.
      To investigate potential causes for the variability in precision between the two methods, the RSD of the signal intensities of 206Pb, 207Pb, and 238U/206Pb signal ratios of zircon 91500 obtained under the same experimental conditions were statistically analyzed. For Method 1, the RSD values for the collection of 206Pb, 207Pb signals, and 238U/206Pb signal ratios were 13%, 13%, and 5.2%, respectively. Meanwhile, for method 2, the RSD values for 206Pb, 207Pb signals, and 238U/206Pb isotope signal ratios were 14%, 19%, and 9.3%, respectively. Simultaneously collecting multiple elements extended the mass spectrometer’s single-scan time, which to some extent affected the stability of the detected element/isotope signals and their ratios, especially for low-content isotopes like 207Pb. The fluctuation characteristics of isotopic signals and ratios corresponded to the changes in U-Pb dating results. Considering factors during data processing, age uncertainty calculation methods, and influencing elements[43-46], it can be inferred that the impact of simultaneous multi-element detection on the stability of isotope signal intensity might be the primary cause for the increased final dating result errors.
      Generally, the precision of LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating results is considered to be within 1% to 2%, while the accuracy of the measured age can reach 1% or better[43-46]. The experimental results in this study indicate that although simultaneous multi-element detection can increase the range of changes in single-point zircon U-Pb ages, the precision of the data is still better than 2%. Furthermore, simultaneous multi-element detection does not affect the accuracy of the sample’s concordia age and the 206Pb/238U weighted average age. For method 1, the relative deviations of concordia ages and 206Pb/238U weighted average ages for each sample compared to TIMS ages are less than 0.5%, while for method 2, these figures are less than 1.0% and 0.7%, respectively.
      (2) Quantitative results of trace elements
      The results of trace element analysis in zircon samples are shown in Table 3. The detection limits for REE range between 11ng/g and 73ng/g, with the majority being below 20ng/g. Among these, the detection limits for La and Pr are 20ng/g and 13ng/g, respectively. Ti has the highest detection limit, reaching up to 302ng/g, while Pb, Th, and U have the lowest detection limits at 15ng/g, 4ng/g, and 2ng/g, respectively.
      Si and Zr were employed as internal standard elements for quantitative analysis. All quantitative results of zircon samples using Si as the internal standard element show slightly higher values overall than those calculated using Zr as the internal standard element (Fig.2b). For the 91500 and SA01 samples, the analysis results using Si as the internal standard exhibit relative errors of less than 10% compared to the recommended values in literature [35] and [48]. However, when using Zr as the internal standard, the relative errors range between 10% and 20%. Furthermore, due to significant differences in Zr content between zircon and the selected standard samples, prolonged flushing is required after zircon analysis to decrease the background Zr levels in the instrument under conditions of high aerosol diffusion space. This prolonged flushing might impact the accuracy of Zr detection in the standard samples.
  • [1]
    Engi M. Petrochronology based on REE-minerals: Monazite, allanite, xenotime, apatite[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2017, 83(1): 365−418. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2017.83.12
    [2]
    赵令浩, 詹秀春, 曾令森, 等. 磷灰石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年直接校准方法研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(5): 744−753.

    Zhao L H, Zhan X C, Zeng L S, et al. Direct calibration method for LA-HR-ICP-MS apatite U-Pb dating[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(5): 744−753.
    [3]
    Chew D M, Spikings R A. Apatite U-Pb thermochronology: A review[J]. Minerals, 2021, 11(10): 1095−1116. doi: 10.3390/min11101095
    [4]
    赵令浩, 曾令森, 詹秀春, 等. 榍石LA-SF-ICP-MS U-Pb定年及对结晶和封闭温度的指示[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(10): 2983−2994. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2020.10.04

    Zhao L H, Zeng L S, Zhan X C, et al. In situ U-Pb dating of titanite by LA-SF-ICP-MS and insights into titanite crystallization and closure temperature[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2020, 36(10): 2983−2994. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2020.10.04
    [5]
    Luo T, Zhao H, Zhang W, et al. Non-matrix-matched analysis of U-Th-Pb geochronology of bastnäsite by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2021, 64(4): 667−676. doi: 10.1007/s11430-020-9715-1
    [6]
    Hoskin P W O, Schaltegger U. The composition of zircon and igneous and metamorphic petrogenesis[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2003, 53(1): 27−62. doi: 10.2113/0530027
    [7]
    Toscano M, Pascual E, Nesbitt R W, et al. Geochemical discrimination of hydrothermal and igneous zircon in the Iberian Pyrite Belt, Spain[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2014, 56: 301−311. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.06.007
    [8]
    Rubatto D. Zircon trace element geochemistry: Partitioning with garnet and the link between U-Pb ages and metamorphism[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 184(1-2): 123−138. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00355-2
    [9]
    Pyle J, Spear F. Yttrium zoning in garnet: Coupling of major and accessory phases during metamorphic reactions[J]. American Mineralogist, 2003,88(4): 708.
    [10]
    Henrichs I A, Chew D M, O’Sullivan G J, et al. Trace element (Mn-Sr-Y-Th-REE) and U-Pb isotope systematics of metapelitic apatite during progressive greenschist- to amphibolite-facies barrovian metamorphism[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2019, 20(8): 4103−4129. doi: 10.1029/2019GC008359
    [11]
    O’Sullivan G, Chew D, Kenny G, et al. The trace element composition of apatite and its application to detrital provenance studies[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, 201: 103044. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.103044
    [12]
    Watson E B, Harrison T M. Zircon thermometer reveals minimum melting conditions on earliest Earth[J]. Science, 2005, 308(5723): 841−844. doi: 10.1126/science.1110873
    [13]
    Hayden L A, Watson E B, Wark D A. A thermobarometer for sphene (titanite)[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2008, 155(4): 529−540. doi: 10.1007/s00410-007-0256-y
    [14]
    Ballard J R, Palin J M, Campbell I H. Relative oxidation states of magmas inferred from Ce(Ⅳ)/Ce(Ⅲ) in zircon: Application to porphyry copper deposits of Northern Chile[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2002, 144(3): 347−364. doi: 10.1007/s00410-002-0402-5
    [15]
    Zeng L, Asimow P D, Saleeby J B. Coupling of anatectic reactions and dissolution of accessory phases and the Sr and Nd isotope systematics of anatectic melts from a metasedimentary source[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2005, 69(14): 3671−3682. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.02.035
    [16]
    Zeng L, Gao L E, Zhao L, et al. The role of titanite in shaping the geochemistry of amphibolite-derived melts[J]. Lithos, 2021, 402-403: 106312. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106312
    [17]
    赵令浩, 曾令森, 胡明月, 等. 金红石-榍石转变过程中元素地球化学行为——以雅鲁藏布江缝合带角闪岩为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(8): 2494−2508.

    Zhao L H, Zeng L S, Hu M Y, et al. Rutile to titanite trasformation in amphibolite and its geochemical consequences: A case study of the amphibolite from Yarlung Tsangpo suture zone[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(8): 2494−2508.
    [18]
    赵令浩, 曾令森, 高利娥, 等. 变基性岩部分熔融过程中榍石的微量元素效应: 以南迦巴瓦混合岩为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(9): 2714−2728. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2020.09.07

    Zhao L H, Zeng L S, Gao L E, et al. Role of titanite in the redistribution of key trace elements during partial melting of meta-mafic rocks: An example from Namche Barwa migmatite[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2020, 36(9): 2714−2728. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2020.09.07
    [19]
    Zhao L, Zeng L, Gao L, et al. Rutile to titanite transformation in eclogites and its geochemical consequences: An example from the Sumdo Eclogite, Tibet[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition, 2023, 97(1): 122−133. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.14919
    [20]
    Engi M, Lanari P, Kohn M. Significant ages—An introduction to petrochronology[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2017, 83(1): 1−12.
    [21]
    Wei Q D, Yang M, Romer R L, et al. In situ U-Pb geochronology of vesuvianite by LA-SF-ICP-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2022, 37(1): 69−81. doi: 10.1039/D1JA00303H
    [22]
    Seman S, Stockli D F, McLean N M. U-Pb geochronology of grossular-andradite garnet[J]. Chemical Geology, 2017, 460: 106−116. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.04.020
    [23]
    Woodhead J, Petrus J. Exploring the advantages and limitations of in situ U-Pb carbonate geochronology using speleothems[J]. Geochronology, 2019, 1: 69−84. doi: 10.5194/gchron-1-69-2019
    [24]
    Li D, Tan C, Miao F, et al. Initiation of Zn-Pb mineralization in the Pingbao Pb-Zn skarn district, South China: Constraints from U-Pb dating of grossular-rich garnet[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2019, 107: 587−599. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.03.011
    [25]
    Yang Y H, Wu F Y, Yang J H, et al. U-Pb age determination of schorlomite garnet by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33(2): 231−239. doi: 10.1039/C7JA00315C
    [26]
    Kylander-Clark A R C, Hacker B R, Cottle J M. Laser-ablation split-stream ICP petrochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 2013, 345: 99−112. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.02.019
    [27]
    Hattendorf B, Latkoczy C, Günther D. Peer reviewed: Laser ablation-ICPMS[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2003, 75(15): 341A−347A. doi: 10.1021/ac031283r
    [28]
    Kooijman E, Berndt J, Mezger K. U-Pb dating of zircon by laser ablation ICP-MS: Recent improvements and new insights[J]. European Journal of Mineralogy, 2012, 24: 5−21. doi: 10.1127/0935-1221/2012/0024-2170
    [29]
    Wu S, Yang M, Yang Y, et al. Improved in situ zircon U-Pb dating at high spatial resolution (5-16μm) by laser ablation-single collector-sector field-ICP-MS using jet sample and X skimmer cones[J]. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2020, 456: 116394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2020.116394
    [30]
    Roberts N M W, Rasbury E T, Parrish R R, et al. A calcite reference material for LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2017, 18(7): 2807−2814. doi: 10.1002/2016GC006784
    [31]
    Latkoczy C, Günther D. Enhanced sensitivity in inductively coupled plasma sector field mass spectrometry for direct solid analysis using laser ablation (LA-ICP-SFMS)[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2002, 17(10): 1264−1270. doi: 10.1039/B204532J
    [32]
    Wiedenbeck M, Allé P, Corfu F, et al. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses[J]. Geostandards Newsletter, 1995, 19(1): 1−23. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.1995.tb00147.x
    [33]
    Jackson S E, Pearson N J, Griffin W L, et al. The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U-Pb zircon geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 2004, 211: 47−69. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.017
    [34]
    Hu Z, Li X H, Luo T, et al. Tanz zircon megacrysts: A new zircon reference material for the microbeam determination of U-Pb ages and Zr-O isotopes[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2021, 36(12): 2715−2734. doi: 10.1039/D1JA00311A
    [35]
    Huang C, Wang H, Yang J H, et al. SA01—A proposed zircon reference material for microbeam U-Pb age and Hf-O isotopic determination[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2020, 44(1): 103−123. doi: 10.1111/ggr.12307
    [36]
    Black L P, Kamo S L, Allen C M, et al. TEMORA 1: A new zircon standard for Phanerozoic U-Pb geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 2003, 200(1): 155−170.
    [37]
    Sláma J, Košler J, Condon D J, et al. Plešovice zircon—A new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 249(1-2): 1−35. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.11.005
    [38]
    李献华, 唐国强, 龚冰, 等. Qinghu(清湖)锆石: 一个新的U-Pb年龄和O, Hf同位素微区分析工作标样[J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(20): 1954−1961. doi: 10.1360/csb2013-58-20-1954

    Li X H, Tang G Q, Gong B, et al. Qinghu zircon: A working reference for microbeam analusis of U-Pb age and Hf and O isotopes[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(20): 1954−1961. doi: 10.1360/csb2013-58-20-1954
    [39]
    Horn I, Günther D. The influence of ablation carrier gasses Ar, He and Ne on the particle size distribution and transport efficiencies of laser ablation-induced aerosols: Implications for LA-ICP-MS[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2003, 207(1-4): 144−157. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)01324-7
    [40]
    Hu Z, Gao S, Liu Y, et al. Signal enhancement in laser ablation ICP-MS by addition of nitrogen in the central channel gas[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2008, 23(8): 1093−1101. doi: 10.1039/b804760j
    [41]
    Griffin W, Powell W, Pearson N J, et al. GLITTER: Data reduction software for laser ablation ICP-MS[M]//Sylvester P. Laser ablation-ICP-MS in the Earth sciences. Mineralogical Association of Canada, 2008: 204-207.
    [42]
    Ludwig K R. User’s manual for Isoplot 3.6: A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft excel[M]. Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2003.
    [43]
    李献华, 柳小明, 刘勇胜, 等. LA-ICPMS锆石U-Pb定年的准确度: 多实验室对比分析[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2015, 45(9): 1294-1303.

    Li X H, Liu X M, Liu Y S, et al. Accuracy of LA-ICPMS zircon U-Pb age determination: An inter-laboratory comparison[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2015, 58: 1722-1730.
    [44]
    Horstwood M, Košler J, Gehrels G, et al. Community-derived standards for LA-ICP-MS U-(Th)-Pb geochronology—Uncertainty propagation, age interpretation and data reporting[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2016, 40(3): 311−332. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2016.00379.x
    [45]
    Fisher C, Longerich H, Jackson S, et al. Data acquisition and calculation of U-Pb isotopic analyses using laser ablation (single collector) inductively coupled plasma mass sperometry[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2010, 25: 1905−1920. doi: 10.1039/c004955g
    [46]
    Schoene B, Condon D, Morgan L, et al. Precision and accuracy in geochronology[J]. Ekements, 2013, 9: 19−24.
    [47]
    Liu Y, Hu Z, Zong K, et al. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15): 1535−1546. doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3052-4
    [48]
    Wiedenbeck M, Hanchar J M, Peck W H, et al. Further characterisation of the 91500 zircon crystal[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2004, 28(1): 9−39. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2004.tb01041.x
    [49]
    Zhao K D, Jiang S Y, Ling H F, et al. Reliability of LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of zircons with high U concentrations: A case study from the U-bearing Douzhashan granite in South China[J]. Chemical Geology, 2014, 389: 110−121. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.09.018
    [50]
    Marillo-Sialer E, Woodhead J, Hanchar J M, et al. An investigation of the laser-induced zircon ‘matrix effect’[J]. Chemical Geology, 2016, 438: 11−24. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.014
  • Related Articles

    [1]GONG Liqiang, LI Zhihong, ZHOU Bo, ZHOU Zhengyuan. Research Progress on the Preparation and Analytical Methods of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202412310279
    [2]WANG Baoli, ZHANG Yijun, ZHANG Yuhang, CHEN Yan. Research Progress of Biochar Based Materials and Their Applications Using Electrochemical Sensors[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2024, 43(6): 967-981. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202403170058
    [3]Development of a Portable Extinction Photometer and Its Application to in situ Rapid Detection of Adulterated Milk[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2008, 27(3): 169-173.
    [4]Discussion on the Definition and Classification of Detection Limit[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2008, 27(2): 155-157.
    [5]Hydride Generation and Its Application in Analysis and Detection Field[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2008, 27(1): 55-59.
    [6]A View of the Present Status and Development Trends on Geoanalytical Instrumentation in China and Abroad[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2007, 26(6): 472-476.
    [7]An Interface Program for Data Processing in AAS Analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2006, 25(3): 291-293.
    [8]Discussion on the Detection Limit in X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometric Analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2003, (4): 291-296.
    [9]The Software for Tackling the Export Data in Instrument Analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2003, (1): 49-54.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 侯将,肖传晶,姚阔为. 快速检测技术在水环境污染物检测中的应用研究进展. 实验室检测. 2024(07): 30-33 .
    2. 高启宇. SPE-UFLC-MS法测定医药废水中8种四环素类抗生素. 化学工程师. 2024(08): 30-34 .
    3. 赵静,侯静云,高超,包虹艳. 无机及分析化学实验的综合应用教学研究. 保山学院学报. 2024(05): 103-108 .
    4. 王宝丽,张逸君,张宇航,陈艳. 生物炭基材料及其在电化学传感领域的应用. 岩矿测试. 2024(06): 967-981 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (221) PDF downloads (49) Cited by(6)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return