Citation: | ZHANG Chenxi,XIONG Yuxin,FU Jiali,et al. High Spatial Resolution U-Pb dating of Low-Uranium Calcite Using LA-MC-ICP-MS[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis,2024,4X(X):1−16. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202403160057 |
Carbonate minerals combination with the U-Pb isotope dating system can provide direct temporal constraints for geoscientific applications. LA-MC-ICP-MS with its high sensitivity and accuracy, has been successfully applied to the high spatial resolution U-Pb dating of zircon, calcite and other minerals. In this paper, the experimental parameters of LA-MC-ICP-MS are optimised in detail, and a high spatial resolution U-Pb dating method is established for low-uranium calcite minerals. The effects of cone combination, GE mode, N2 introduction and Ar carrier gas flow rate on the U and Pb signal intensity and oxide yield (UO/U) are discussed in detail. The results showed that the highest sensitivity of Pb was achieved under the conditions of Jet+X cone combination, GE on mode, 8mL/min N2 introduction and 0.9L/min Ar carrier gas flow rate, while the oxide yield (UO/U) was lower than 1%. Three low uranium (0.04-0.63μg/g), calcite U-Pb dating reference materials were used to validate the reliability of the method. Samples LD-5, PTKD-2 and TARIM yield a lower intercept age of 73.20±0.56Ma, 152.7±2.5Ma and 206.2±1.3Ma, respectively, under the condition of 44μm beamspot, which are in agreement with the calibrated results of ID-TIMS/ID-MC-ICP-MS within the error range. The BRIEF REPORT is available for this paper at http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.ykcs.202403160057.
Significance: Carbonate minerals,especially calcite,are widely distributed and formed as primary and secondary minerals in a variety of geological environments[1]. The U-Th-Pb dating technique is one of the most classical isotopes dating methods,applicable to almost the entire geologic time scale,and calcite can be bound to uranium during its formation,making it a potentially suitable timer for U-Pb and U-Th geochronology[7-8]. Therefore,calcite geochronology can provide direct temporal constraints for many geoscientific applications and has a very broad application prospect. However,carbonate minerals usually have relatively low U contents,which have hindered the development of this method. With its high sensitivity and high accuracy,MC-ICP-MS has been successfully applied to high spatial resolution U-Pb dating for many high U content auxiliary minerals.LA-MC-ICP-MS with high sensitivity and accuracy has been successfully applied to high spatial resolution U-Pb dating of a wide range of minor minerals include carbonate minerals. Zhang et al [22] carried out a calcite U-Pb age methodology using mixed collectors (FCs+ICs) and multiple ions counting collectors (MICs) analytical mode. And achieved accurate U-Pb age determinations for PKC-1 (uranium content of 6.2-74.18μg/g),Duff Brown Tank,JT and ASH-15 standards for accurate U-Pb age determination by optimising the mass spectrometer and laser parameters at 33μm,90μm,75μm and 110μm beam spots,respectively. Xie et al[21] achieved accurate U-Pb age determinations of low-uranium (down to 0.03μg/g) calcite at 85μm beam spot conditions using a mixed collectors (FCs+ICs) mode based on optimised instrumental parameters. However,the previous U-Pb age analysis studies have not investigated the influence of the oxide yield and the guard electrode modes of the MC-ICP-MS instrument in detail. In addition,the U-Pb age analyses have only been carried out on carbonate samples with high uranium content (Duff Brown Tank,ASH-15,etc.,with ≥2 μg/g uranium) with U-Pb ages below 50μm beam spot. The spatial resolution of U-Pb dating of low uranium carbonate samples (<1μg/g) needs to be further improved.
Methods: The samples used in the experiments were NIST glass standards NIST612 and NIST614[28],and the calcite reference materials WC-1,PTKD-2,LD-5,and TARIM,listed in Table 1. NIST612 was used to optimise the instrumental parameters,NIST614 and WC-1 were used as standards to calibrate 207Pb/206Pb and 238U/206Pb ratios,and PTKD-2,LD-5,and TARIM were unknown samples with low uranium contents. Glass and calcite samples were fixed in epoxy resin to prepare the target and polished with 7000 grit sandpaper until the sample surface was exposed. Sample surfaces were polished smooth with 0.3μm Al2O3 polishing powder and ultrasonically cleaned with ultrapure water prior to each test.
The Neptune Plus multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS,ThermoFisher Scientific) and the GeoLas Pro excimer laser ablation system (LA,Coherent) were used in this experiment. In order to achieving the highest sensitivity,multiple ions counting collectors (MICs) analytical mode was used to receive all U and Pb elements,and the specific cup configuration and instrumental parameter settings are shown in Table 2.
The data were processed using the two-step calibration method of the previous work[29]. The raw data were first imported into the Iolite software[30] and processed using X_U-Pb_Geochro4. After blank subtraction,the 207Pb/206Pb and 238U/206Pb ratios of the calcite standard WC-1 and the unknown samples were calibrated using NIST 614 as an external standard sample and the uncertainty of the ratios was derived with a single-point internal precision of 2 SE. The 238U/206Pb ratio of the unknown sample was further corrected with matrix-matched WC-1,and the 207Pb/206Pb,238U/206Pb of WC-1 was plotted on a Tera-Wasserburg plot using IsoplotR[31],and the ratio of the obtained lower intercept to the reference lower intercept (26.43) is the correction factor. This correction factor includes matrix effects,laser induced fractionation and fractionation between U/Pb elements associated with ICP and is used to further correct the 238U/206Pb ratio of the unknown sample. Finally,the 207Pb/206Pb and 238U/206Pb ratios of the samples resulting from the two-step correction were plotted on a Tera-Wasserburg plot using IsoplotR to calculate the lower intersection age and age uncertainty (2SE).
Data and Results: The effects of the experimental parameters (including the cone combination,the amount of nitrogen introduced,whether the guard electrode is open,and the Ar carrier gas flow rate) on the U and Pb sensitivity and the plasma state (oxide yield,UO/U) were systematically discussed in order to realize the best analysis instrument parameters. The Jet+X cone combination and the introduction of N2 had significant sensitising effects on both U and Pb. The Jet+X cone combination combined with the introduction of N2 increased the sensitivities of U and Pb to a maximum of 7.4 and 5.8 times,respectively,under GE on conditions. See Fig.1 and Fig.2 for details. The high-sensitivity Jet+X cone combination and the introduction of N2 have obvious sensitizing effects on U and Pb. The sensitivity of U and Pb was enhanced up to 7.4 and 5.8 times under the GE on mode,the Jet+X cone combination and with the introduction of N2. In which the sensitizing effect of the high-sensitivity cone combination on Pb is more obvious,and that of the introduction of N2 on U is more obvious.
Fig.3 shows the effect of the instrumental conditions on the oxide yield,the oxide yield (UO/U) in the GE on mode is usually higher than that in the GE off condition,and the oxide yield becomes rapidly higher with the increase of the Ar carrier gas flow rate. In addition,the optimisation of the experimental conditions is aimed at increasing the sensitivity and decreasing the oxide yield,in other word,the conditions with the highest sensitivity are chosen at lower oxide yields. Fig.4 shows the maximum signal intensity of 206Pb for different instrumental conditions for oxide yields (UO/U) within 1% and the Ar carrier gas flow rate corresponding to the maximum signal intensity. The best experimental conditions were achieved using the Jet+X cone combination,N2 flow rate of 8 mL/min and the GE on mode,corresponding to an Ar carrier gas flow of 0.9 L/min.
Under optimised experimental conditions,the same depth to diameter ratios (aspect ratio) of the ablation crater is guaranteed,and the “down-hole” fractionation behavior of WC-1 is similar under different laser spot sizes and frequencies. Based on the optimized experimental parameters,the method was validated using three low-uranium (0.04-0.63μg/g) calcite U-Pb dating reference materials. High-uranium WC-1 was used for 238U/206Pb correcting,the spot size and frequency were altered on the premise of crater aspect ratios of the standard and samples keeping consistent. In our experiment,the calcite samples LD-5,PTKD-2 and TARIM yield a lower intercept age of 73.20±0.56Ma,152.7±2.5Ma and 206.2±1.3Ma,respectively,which were in agreement with the calibrated results from the ID-TIMS/ID-MC-ICP-MS within uncertainties.
[1] |
Rasbury E T, Cole J M. Directly Dating Geologic Events: U‐Pb Dating of Carbonates[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2009, 47(3): RG3001. doi: 10.1029/2007RG000246
|
[2] |
Roberts N M W, Holdsworth R E. Timescales of Faulting Through Calcite Geochronology: A Review[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2022, 158: 104578. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2022.104578
|
[3] |
肖志斌, 耿建珍, 涂家润, 等. 砂岩型铀矿微区原位U-Pb同位素定年技术方法研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2020, 39(2): 262−273. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201908120129
Xiao Z B, Geng J Z, Tu J R, et al. In situ U-Pb Isotope Dating Techniques for Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposits[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2020, 39(2): 262−273. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201908120129
|
[4] |
赵令浩, 詹秀春, 曾令森, 等. 磷灰石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年直接校准方法研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(5): 744−753. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202202260035
Zhao L H, Zhan X C, Zeng L S, et al. Direct Calibration Method for LA-HR-ICP-MS Apatite U-Pb Dating[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(5): 744−753. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202202260035
|
[5] |
Jahn B, Cuvellier H. Pb-Pb and U-Pb Geochronology of Carbonate Rocks: An Assessment[J]. Chemical Geology, 1994, 115(1−2): 125−151. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)90149-X
|
[6] |
Roberts N M W, Drost K, Horstwood M S A, et al. Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb Carbonate Geochronology: Strategies, Progress, and Limitations[J]. Geochronology, 2020, 2(1): 33−61. doi: 10.5194/gchron-2-33-2020
|
[7] |
赵子贤, 施炜. 方解石LA-(MC-)ICP-MS U-Pb定年技术及其在脆性构造中的应用[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2019, 41(5): 505−516. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2019.05.001
Zhao Z X, Shi W. LA-(MC-)ICP MS U-Pb Dating Technique of Calcite and Its Application in Brittle Structures[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2019, 41(5): 505−516. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2019.05.001
|
[8] |
杨鹏, 袁海锋, 马奎, 等. 川中太和气区震旦系灯影组二段储层成岩流体演化及油气成藏史——来自岩石学、原位地球化学、流体包裹体及年代学的证据[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(7): 2332−2353. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2023.07.014
Yang P, Yuan H F, Ma K, et al. Diagenetic Fluid Evolution and Hydrocarbon Accumulation History of Second Member of the Sinian Dengying Formation in the Taihe Gas Area, Central Sichuan Basin: Evidence from Petrology, in situ Geochemistry, Fluid Inclusions and Chronology[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2023, 97(7): 2332−2353. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2023.07.014
|
[9] |
刘恩涛, ZHAO Jian-xin, 潘松圻, 等. 盆地流体年代学研究新技术: 方解石激光原位U-Pb定年法[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(3): 698−712. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.958
Liu E T, Zhao J X, Pan S Q, et al. A New Technology of Basin Fluid Geochronology: In-situ U-Pb Dating of Calcite[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3): 698−712. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.958
|
[10] |
高伊雪, 邱昆峰, 于皓丞, 等. 碳酸盐矿物激光原位U-Pb定年基本原理、分析方法与地学应用[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2022, 41(4): 786−803. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2022.04.008
Gao Y X, Qiu K F, Yu H C, et al. Principle, Methods, and Geological Applications of Carbonates LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Geochronology[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2022, 41(4): 786−803. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2022.04.008
|
[11] |
张亮亮, 朱弟成, 谢锦程, 等. 碳酸盐矿物激光原位U-Pb定年: 进展与展望[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2022, 41(6): 1120−1134. doi: 10.19658/i.issn.1007-2802.2022.41.091
Zhang L L, Zhu D C, Xie J C, et al. Advances and Perspectives of the in-situ Laser Ablation Carbonate Minerals U-Pb Dating[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2022, 41(6): 1120−1134. doi: 10.19658/i.issn.1007-2802.2022.41.091
|
[12] |
Pickering R, Kramers J D, Partridge T, et al. U-Pb Dating of Calcite-Aragonite Layers in Speleothems from Hominin Sites in South Africa by MC-ICP-MS[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2010, 5(5): 544−558. doi: 10.1016/j.quageo.2009.12.004
|
[13] |
Rasbury E, Hanson G, Meyers W, et al. Dating of the Time of Sedimentation Using U-Pb Ages for Paleosol Calcite[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1997, 61(7): 1525−1529. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00043-4
|
[14] |
Brannon J C, Cole S C, Podosek F A, et al. Th-Pb and U-Pb Dating of Ore-Stage Calcite and Paleozoic Fluid Flow[J]. Science, 1996, 271(5248): 491−493. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5248.491
|
[15] |
Yang P, Wu G, Nuriel P, et al. In situ LA-ICPMS U-Pb Dating and Geochemical Characterization of Fault-Zone Calcite in the Central Tarim Basin, Northwest China: Implications for Fluid Circulation and Fault Reactivation[J]. Chemical Geology, 2021, 568: 120125. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120125
|
[16] |
Roberts N M W, Walker R J. U-Pb Geochronology of Calcite-Mineralized Faults: Absolute Timing of Rift-Related Fault Events on the Northeast Atlantic Margin[J]. Geology, 2016, 44(7): 531−534. doi: 10.1130/G37868.1
|
[17] |
Coogan L A, Parrish R R, Roberts N M W. Early Hydrothermal Carbon Uptake by the Upper Oceanic Crust: Insight from in situ U-Pb Dating[J]. Geology, 2016, 44(2): 147−150. doi: 10.1130/G37212.1
|
[18] |
鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 陈玮岩, 等. 激光原位碳酸盐岩U-Pb定年实验方法改进与石油地质应用[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2023, 66(12): 2914−2929. doi: 10.1360/SSTe-2022-0257
Lu X S, Gui L L, Chen W Y, et al. Improvement of in situ LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Dating Method for Carbonate Minerals and Its Application in Petroleum Geology[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2023, 66(12): 2914−2929. doi: 10.1360/SSTe-2022-0257
|
[19] |
吴石头, 杨岳衡, Nick M. W. Roberts, 等. 高灵敏度-单接收杯LA-SF-ICP-MS原位方解石U-Pb定年[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2022, 65(6): 1146−1160. doi: 10.1360/N072021-0165
Wu S T, Yang Y H, Roberts N M W, et al. In situ Calcite U-Pb Geochronology by High-Sensitivity Single-Collector LA-SF-ICP-MS[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2022, 65(6): 1146−1160. doi: 10.1360/N072021-0165
|
[20] |
Luo K, Zhou J X, Feng Y X, et al. In situ U-Pb Dating of Calcite from the South China Antimony Metallogenic Belt[J]. iScience, 2020, 23: 101575. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101575
|
[21] |
谢博航, 吴石头, 杨岳衡, 等. LA-MC-ICP-MS方解石U-Pb定年技术[J]. 岩石学报, 2023, 39(1): 236−248. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2023.01.16
Xie B H, Wu S T, Yang Y H, et al. LA-MC-ICP-MS Calcite U-Pb Dating Technique[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2023, 39(1): 236−248. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2023.01.16
|
[22] |
Zhang L L, Zhu D C, Yang Y H, et al. U-Pb Geochronology of Carbonate by Laser Ablation MC-ICP-MS: Method Improvements and Geological Applications[J]. Atomic Spectroscopy, 2021, 42(6): 335−348. doi: 10.46770/AS.2021.803
|
[23] |
程婷, Jianxin Zhao, Yuexing Feng, 等. 低铀碳酸盐矿物的LA-MC-ICPMS微区原位U-Pb定年方法[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(2−3): 150−154. doi: 10.1360/TB-2019-0355
Cheng T, Zhao J X, Feng Y X, et al. LA-MC-ICPMS U-Pb Dating Method for Low-Uranium Carbonate Minerals[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(2−3): 150−154. doi: 10.1360/TB-2019-0355
|
[24] |
Nuriel P, Craddock J, Kylander-Clark A R C, et al. Reactivation History of the North Anatolian Fault Zone Based on Calcite Age-Strain Analyses[J]. Geology, 2019, 47(5): 465−469. doi: 10.1130/G45727.1
|
[25] |
Yokoyama T, Kimura J, Mitsuguchi T, et al. U-Pb Dating of Calcite Using LA-ICP-MS: Instrumental Setup for Non-Matrix-Matched Age Dating and Determination of Analytical Areas Using Elemental Imaging[J]. Geochemical Journal, 2018, 52(6): 531−540. doi: 10.2343/geochemj.2.0541
|
[26] |
Nguyen A D, Feng Y X, Cheng T, et al. LA‐(MC)‐ICP-MS U‐Pb Geochronology-Potential Calcite Reference Materials[A].Barcelona: Goldschmidt Conference, 2019.
|
[27] |
Zhang L L, Zhu D C, Xie J C, et al. TARIM Calcite: A Potential Reference Material for Laser ICPMS in situ Calcite U-Pb Dating[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2023, 38(11): 2302−2312. doi: 10.1039/d3ja00222e
|
[28] |
Klaus P J, Ulrike W, Brigitte S, et al. Determination of Reference Values for NIST SRM610−617 Glasses Following ISO Guidelines[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2011, 35(4): 397−429. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2011.00120.x
|
[29] |
Roberts N M W, Rasbury E T, Parrish R R, et al. A Calcite Reference Material for LA‐ICP‐MS U‐Pb Geochronology[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2017, 18(7): 2807−2814. doi: 10.1002/2016GC006784
|
[30] |
Paton C, Hellstrom J, Paul B, et al. Iolite: Freeware for the Visualization and Processing of Mass Spectrometric Data[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2011, 26(12): 2508−2518. doi: 10.1039/C1JA10172B
|
[31] |
Vermeesch P. IsoplotR: A Free and Open Toolbox for Geochronology[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2018, 9(5): 1479−1493. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001
|
[32] |
Hu Z C, Liu Y S, Gao S, et al. Improved in situ Hf Isotope Ratio Analysis of Zircon Using Newly Designed X Skimmer Cone and Jet Sample Cone in Combination with the Addition of Nitrogen by Laser Ablation Multiple Collector ICP-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2012, 27(9): 1391−1399. doi: 10.1039/c2ia30078h
|
[33] |
Flamigni L, Koch J, Günther D. The Effect of Carrier Gas Humidity on the Vaporization of Laser-Produced Aerosols in Inductively Coupled Plasmas[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2014, 29(2): 280−286. doi: 10.1039/c3ja50314c
|
[34] |
He T, Ni Q, Miao Q, et al. Effects of Cone Combinations on the Signal Enhancement by Nitrogen in LA-ICP-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33: 1021−1030. doi: 10.1039/C7JA00376E
|
[35] |
何焘, 张晨西, 张文, 等. 高空间分辨率LA-ICP-MS测定硅酸盐玻璃标准物质中42种微量元素[J]. 岩矿测试, 2023, 42(5): 983−995. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202308090134
He T, Zhang C X, Zhang W, et al. Determination of 42 Trace Elements in Silicate Glass Reference Materials by High Spatial Resolution LA-ICP-MS[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(5): 983−995. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202308090134
|
[36] |
ver Hoeve T J, Scoates J S, Wall C J, et al. Evaluating Downhole Fractionation Corrections in LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Zircon Geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 2018, 483: 201−217. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.12.014
|
[37] |
罗涛, 胡兆初. 激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱副矿物U-Th-Pb定年新进展[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(11): 4122−4144. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.365
Luo T, Hu Z C. Recent Advances in U-Th-Pb Dating of Accessory Minerals by Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(11): 4122−4144. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.365
|
[38] |
Guillong M, Wotzlaw J F, Looser N, et al. Evaluating the Reliability of U-Pb Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) Carbonate Geochronology: Matrix Issues and a Potential Calcite Validation Reference Material[J]. Geochronology, 2020, 2(1): 155−167. doi: 10.5194/gchron-2-155-2020
|