• Core Journal of China
  • DOAJ
  • Scopus
  • Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations (CSTPC)
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
Effect of Experimental Conditions on X-ray Diffractometric Quantitative Phase Analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2008, 27(1): 60-62.
Citation: Effect of Experimental Conditions on X-ray Diffractometric Quantitative Phase Analysis[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2008, 27(1): 60-62.

Effect of Experimental Conditions on X-ray Diffractometric Quantitative Phase Analysis

More Information
  • Received Date: April 10, 2007
  • Revised Date: June 05, 2007
  • The matrix effect on X-ray diffractometric quantitative multiphase analysis was studied through experiments. Influential factors such as K value (I/Ic), diffraction signal intensity, sample particle size for all phases and power of X-ray tube used were emphasized. The results showed that qualitative analysis was the prerequisite of quantitative analysis. Some measures, including using integral intensities, making sample particle size as fine and homogeneous as possible in all phases, using X-ray tube power and suitable scanning speed, were taken and the accuracy of quantitative X-ray diffraction phase phase analysis was remarkably improved.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Chang-qing YANG, Shuang-shuang ZHANG, Nan WU, Yan-na HOU, Cai-chun XU, Zhi-bin XU. Feasibility Study on Content Determination of Mercury and Arsenic in High Organic Anthracite by Microwave Digestion-Hydride Generation-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry and Mass Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2016, 35(5): 481-487. DOI: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.05.006
    [2]ZHOU Hui-qiong, ZHU Xia-ping, LIAO Yu-you. Simultaneous Determination of As and Hg in Fertilizers by Hydride Generation-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry with Microwave Digestion[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2012, 31(2): 268-271.
    [3]SU Ming-yue, CHEN Guang-zhi, WANG Jing, YAO Chuan-gang. Determination of Arsenic and Mercury in Iron Ores by Water-bath Digestion-Hydride Generation-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry with a Sequential Injection System[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2011, 30(2): 210-213.
    [4]WEI Jian-lu, SONG Hai-tao, WANG Hai-chao, ZHOU Hong-xia. Determination of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth in Geochemical Samples by Hydride Generation-Double Channel Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2010, 29(4): 451-454.
    [5]XU Guo-dong, GE Jian-hua, JIA Hui-xian, DU Gu, CHENG Jiang, DONG Jun. Simultaneous Determination of Trace Arsenic and Mercury in Geological Samples by Hydride Generation-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry with Water Bath Soaking Sample Preparation[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2010, 29(4): 391-394.
    [6]ZHAO Bin, CHEN Zhi-bing, DONG Li. Determination of Hg, Se and As in Plant Samples by Hydride Generation-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2010, 29(3): 319-321.
    [7]MA Ling, ZHA Lixin, FENG Lingling, LIU Wenzhang. Determination of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth in Copper Ores by Hydride Generation-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2009, 28(5): 497-498.
    [8]Determination of Trace Selenium in Soil Samples by Hydride Generation-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry with Baking Separation[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2008, 27(2): 120-122.
    [9]Determination of Trace Arsenic, Antimony, Selenium in Soil Samples by Hydride Generation-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry with Slurry Sample Introduction[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2007, 26(6): 460-464.
    [10]Determination of Trace Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth in Copper Ores by Hydride Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry from Alkaline Solution[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 1998, (4): 285-289.

Catalog

    Article views (1688) PDF downloads (1944) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return