| Citation: |
LIU Xuesong，ZHANG Tao，TAO Yanqiu，et al. Research Progress on Detection and Screening Techniques for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis，2025，44（3）：1−16. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202408120172
|
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals widely present in water and soil media with industrial and commercial applications. PFAS has attracted global attention due to its toxicity and bioaccumulation, and its precise identification and quantitative detection are of great significance for pollution prevention and control. This article reviews the latest research progress on pre-treatment methods, detection techniques, and screening methods for PFAS in different media. Analyzed the advantages, disadvantages, and development directions of mainstream extraction techniques and detection methods for PFAS. The system summarizes quantifiable detection standards and key indicator characteristics at home and abroad, explores the advantages, disadvantages, and applicable scenarios of targeted and non targeted screening methods, and focuses on analyzing the characteristics and development prospects of two non targeted screening technologies, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and total PFAS analysis. It is recommended to develop a rapid screening tool for total organic fluorine, develop pre-treatment techniques suitable for different sample matrices, and enrich the PFAS database to provide reference for accurate identification and rapid quantification of PFAS in diverse environments in the future.
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals with wide industrial and commercial applications. They enter environmental media such as water，soil，and gas through food packaging，textiles，cosmetics，and fire-fighting equipment containing PFAS，and are commonly present in surface water，groundwater，soil，and sediments. PFAS has strong chemical inertness and high temperature resistance. In addition，PFAS has also received global attention due to its toxicity and bioaccumulation. The above characteristics determine that once PFAS enters the environment，it is difficult to eliminate naturally and exists in soil，water bodies，and atmosphere for a long time，causing great harm to the ecological environment and posing a long-term threat to the ecosystem.
This article starts with the pre-treatment technology，detection technology，screening methods，and standards of PFAS from the perspectives of identification，quantification，and standardization. It tracks and understands the development level and research progress of PFAS detection and analysis technology at home and abroad，comprehensively analyzes and compares the advantages and disadvantages of sample pre-treatment technology，analysis and detection technology，and screening methods，provides method reference and technical reference for the accurate quantification and rapid identification of PFAS，and provides technical support and data basis for its pollution prevention and harmless treatment.
1. PFAS analysis sample pretreatment technology
The pre-treatment stage of PFAS samples mainly uses solvent extraction technology and solid-phase extraction technology. Solvent extraction techniques include Soxhlet extraction，pressurized liquid extraction (PLE)，liquid-liquid extraction (LLE)，dispersed liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME)，and ion pair extraction (IPE). Solid phase extraction techniques mainly include SPE column extraction，solid-phase microextraction (SPME)，and dispersed solid-phase extraction (DSPE). Different extraction techniques have different principles，and their applicability and recovery rates also vary. By comprehensively utilizing different extraction techniques，FPAS substances can be extracted and separated from samples in different media such as water，soil，and gas，with recovery rates generally ranging from 80% to 145%. In addition to the traditional pretreatment techniques mentioned above，this article also introduces some other simple and effective pretreatment methods for enriching PFAS.
2. PFAS analysis sample analysis and detection technology
PFAS mainly uses separation and physical analysis methods，among which gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry are the most commonly used techniques for separation and fractionation in PFAS analysis. Generally speaking，PFAS can be determined by GC-MS using electron ionization (EI)，negative ion chemical ionization (NICI)，or chemical ionization (CI) under selected ion monitoring modes. The determination of PFAS by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry has the characteristics of easy operation，high sensitivity，and good precision，which can meet the determination needs of perfluorinated compounds in various media. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry combines the advantages of chromatography and mass spectrometry，and can effectively perform qualitative and quantitative analysis on various substances with high boiling points and poor thermal stability. The main methods of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry include liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)，high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS)，ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)，etc. Among them，HPLC-MS/MS and UPLC-MS/MS have been extensively studied for the application of PFAS，with high sensitivity and a detection limit as low as 0.01ng/L. In addition to the traditional detection methods mentioned above，matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI-IMS) is mainly used for in-situ detection and imaging of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid，without involving several complex preparation procedures or introducing contamination. Dielectric barrier discharge ionization mass spectrometry (DBDI-MS) is used to analyze PFOA in water samples without the need for sample preparation and chromatography.
3. PFAS screening method
PFAS belongs to a vast chemical category，comprising over 4700 different compounds with various chemical compositions，molecular weights，functional groups，and fluorine contents，but most quantitative studies only focus on a small subset of them. The PFAS testing standards released by European and American countries and organizations are targeted screening methods that have been validated by multiple laboratories to accurately quantify some PFAS. Targeted screening methods mainly focus on a few PFAS such as PFOA and PFOS (usually with far less than 50 analytes). For unknown PFAS with uncertain standard curves，non targeted screening methods are more important. Currently，non targeted screening methods mainly include PFAS total analysis and high-resolution mass spectrometry chromatography. The PFAS total amount analysis method uses combustion ion chromatography (CIC) and total oxidizable precursor (TOP) determination to quantitatively analyze the total amount of PFAS in the sample，in order to determine the degree of contamination of the sample and its impact on the environment and human health; High resolution mass spectrometry chromatography is mainly used for screening and identifying suspicious or unknown organic fluorine compounds to guide the development of new detection technology standards for quantitative detection of unknown PFAS.
4. Conclusion and Prospect
The advancement of pre-treatment methods and detection technologies for PFAS，especially the development and comprehensive application of non targeted screening techniques，suspected screening techniques，and high-resolution mass spectrometry detection techniques，has promoted the quantification and identification of more peak values in PFAS spectra. The detection range of PFAS types is becoming wider and wider，providing data basis and technical support for more PFAS to enter the list of quantitative detection standards. While PFAS detection technology has made progress，it still faces the following challenges: (1) There are many types of PFAS with similar structures but significant differences in physical and chemical properties，which increases the difficulty of accurate identification and quantitative detection. (2) PFAS is at a trace level in the medium，and improving pre-treatment and analytical detection techniques to identify and quantify lower levels of PFAS will be the key to future technological advancements. (3) Lack of PFAS detection methods and equipment that can be used for rapid on-site identification.
| [1] |
Schymanski E L, Zhang J, Thiessen P A, et al. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in PubChem: 7 Million and Growing[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(44): 16918−16928. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04855
|
| [2] |
Xu B, Yang G, Lehmann A, et al. Effects of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) on Soil Structure and Function[J]. Soil Ecology Letters, 2023, 5(1): 108−117. doi: 10.1007/s42832-022-0143-5
|
| [3] |
You L, Kou J, Wang M, et al. An Exposome Atlas of Serum Reveals the Risk of Chronic Diseases in the Chinese Population[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 2268. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46595-z
|
| [4] |
Xia C J, Capozzi S L, Romanak K A, et al. The Ins and Outs of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Great Lakes: The Role of Atmospheric Deposition[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024, 58(21): 9303−9313. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c10098
|
| [5] |
Wallace M A G, Smeltz M G, Mattila J M, et al. A Review of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods for Detecting Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Indoor and Outdoor Air[J]. Chemosphere, 2024, 358: 142129. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142129
|
| [6] |
于开宁, 王润忠, 刘丹丹. 水环境中新污染物快速检测技术研究进展[J]. 岩矿测试, 2023, 42(6): 1063−1077. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202302080018
Yu K N, Wang R Z, Liu D D. A Review of Rapid Detections for Emerging Contaminants in Ground-Water[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(6): 1063−1077. doi: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202302080018
|
| [7] |
Zhu Q, Qian J, Huang S, et al. Occurrence, Distribution, and input Pathways of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Soils Near Different Sources in Shanghai[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2022, 308: 119620. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119620
|
| [8] |
金磊. 黄浦江上游太浦河水源水体中全氟化合物赋存特征及风险评价[J]. 净水技术, 2021, 40(1): 54−59. doi: 10.15890/j.cnki.jsjs.2021.01.010
Jin L. Risk Assessment and Occurrence Characteristics of PFCs in Water Body of Taipu Water Source in Upstream of Huangpu River[J]. Water Purification Technology, 2021, 40(1): 54−59. doi: 10.15890/j.cnki.jsjs.2021.01.010
|
| [9] |
Li Y N, Yao J Z, Zhang J, et al. First Report on the Bioaccumulation and Trophic Transfer of Perfluoroalkyl Ether Carboxylic Acids in Estuarine Food Web[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 56(10): 6046−6055. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00965
|
| [10] |
Lyu X Y, Xiao F, Shen C Y, et al. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Subsurface Environments: Occurrence, Fate, Transport, and Research Prospect[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2022, 60(3): e2021RG000765. doi: 10.1029/2021RG000765
|
| [11] |
Andersson E M, Scott K, Xu Y, et al. High Exposure to Perfluorinated Compounds in Drinking Water and Thyroid Disease. A Cohort Study from Ronneby, Sweden[J]. Environmental Research, 2019, 176: 108540. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108540
|
| [12] |
Gonzalez-Barreiro C, Martinez-Carballo E, Sitka A, et al. Method Optimization for Determination of Selected Perfluorinated Alkylated Substances in Water Samples[J]. Analytical Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2006, 386(7): 2123−2132.
|
| [13] |
Wang J, Shi Y, Cai Y. A highly Selective Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Approach Based on the Unique Fluorous Affinity for the Extraction and Detection of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Coupled with High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem-Mass Spectrometry[J]. Chromatography A, 2018, 1544: 1−7. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.02.047
|
| [14] |
陶慧, 黄理金, 欧阳磊, 等. 氨基化共价有机骨架固相微萃取涂层用于水体中酚类的高效萃取[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(6): 1040−1049. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2022.6.ykcs202206015
Tao H, Huang L J, Ouyang L, et al. An Amino-Functionlized Covalent Organic Framework Coating for Highly Efficient Solid Phase Microextraction of Trace Phenols in Water[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(6): 1040−1049. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2022.6.ykcs202206015
|
| [15] |
Yao Y, Zhao Y, Sun H, et al. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Indoor Air and Dust from Homes and Various Microenvironments in China: Implications for Human Exposure[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(5): 3156−3166. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04971
|
| [16] |
Padilla-Sanchez J A, Papadopoulou E, Poothong S, et al. Investigation of the Best Approach for Assessing Human Exposure to Poly-and Perfluoroalkyl Substances Through Indoor Air[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(21): 12836−12843. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03516
|
| [17] |
Lorenzo M, Campo J, Pico Y. Analytical Challenges to Determine Emerging Persistent Organic Pollutants in Aquatic Ecosystems[J]. TRAC-Trends Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 103: 137−155. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.04.003
|
| [18] |
Saito K, Uemura E, Ishizaki A, et al. Determination of Perfluorooctanoic Acid and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate by Automated in-Tube Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2010, 658(2): 141−146. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.004
|
| [19] |
Bach C, Boiteux V, Hemard J, et al. Simultaneous Determination of Perfluoroalkyl Iodides, Perfluoroalkane Sulfonamides, Fluorotelomer Alcohols, Fluorotelomer Iodides and Fluorotelomer Acrylates and Methacrylates in Water and Sediments Using Solid-Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry[J]. Chromatography A, 2016, 1448: 98−106. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.04.025
|
| [20] |
Ruan T, Wang Y, Wang T, et al. Presence and Partitioning Behavior of Polyfluorinated Iodine Alkanes in Environmental Matrices Around a Fluorochemical Manufacturing Plant: Another Possible Source for Perfluorinated Carboxylic Acids[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(15): 5755−5761. doi: 10.1021/es101507s
|
| [21] |
Surma M, Wiczkowski W, Cieślik E, et al. Method Development for the Determination of PFOA and PFOS in Honey Based on the Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction (d-SPE) with Micro-UHPLC–MS/MS System[J]. Microchemical Journal, 2015, 121: 150−156. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.02.008
|
| [22] |
Martin J, Rodriguez-Gomez R, Zafra-Gomez A, et al. Validated Method for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Placental Tissue Samples Based on a Simple Extraction Procedure Followed by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis[J]. Talanta, 2016, 150: 169−176. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.12.020
|
| [23] |
Cao Y, Lee C, Davis E T, et al. 1000-Fold Preconcentration of Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances Within 10 Minutes via Electrochemical Aerosol Formation[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 91(22): 14352−14358. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02758
|
| [24] |
Suwannakot P, Lisi F, Ahmed E, et al. Metal-Organic Framework-Enhanced Solid-phase Microextraction Mass Spectrometry for the Direct and Rapid Detection of Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Environmental Water Samples[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 92(10): 6900−6908. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05524
|
| [25] |
Yang L, Jin F, Zhang P, et al. Simultaneous Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Edible Oil by Gel-Permeation Chromatography Combined with Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J]. Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2015, 63(38): 8364−8671. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03903
|
| [26] |
Ayala-Cabrera J F, Contreras-Llin A, Moyano E, et al. A Novel Methodology for the Determination of Neutral Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water by Gas Chromatography-Atmospheric Pressure Photoionisation-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2020, 1100: 97−106. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.12.004
|
| [27] |
王晓研, 沈伟健, 王红, 等. 气相色谱-负化学源-质谱法检测水中10 种全氟羧酸化合物[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(1): 32−39. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2018.07019
Wang X Y, Shen W J, Wang H, et al. Determination of 10 Perfluorinated Carboxylic Acid Compounds in Water by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Negative Chemical Ionization[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019, 37(1): 32−39. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2018.07019
|
| [28] |
李青倩, 李丽和, 王锦, 等. 新污染物的污染现状及其检测方法研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2023, 52(7): 2202−2206. doi: 10.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.20230710.003
Li Q Q, Li L H, Wang J, et al. Study on Emerging Pollutants Pollution Status and Research Progress of Detection Methods[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2023, 52(7): 2202−2206. doi: 10.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.20230710.003
|
| [29] |
Yao Y, Zhao Y, Sun H, et al. Target and Non-Target Analyses of Neutral Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Fluorochemical Industries Using GC-MS/MS and GC-TOF: Insights on Their Environmental Fate[J]. Environment International, 2023(182): 108311. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108311
|
| [30] |
Shoeib M, Harner T, Lee S C, et al. Sorbent Impregnated Polyurethane Foam Disk for Passive Air Sampling of Volatile Fluorinated Chemicals[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 80(3): 675−682. doi: 10.1021/ac701830s
|
| [31] |
Jia S, Santos M M D, Li C, et al. Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry Analytical Techniques for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2022, 414(9): 2795−2807. doi: 10.1007/s00216-022-03905-y
|
| [32] |
Ayala-Cabrera J F, Santos F J, Moyano E. Negative-Ion Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation of Semi-Volatile Fluorinated Compounds for Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis[J]. Analytical Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2018, 410(20): 4913−4924. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1138-z
|
| [33] |
周五端, 梁杰, 卓杰, 等. 气相色谱-质谱联用仪法测定含氟橡胶中全氟辛酸的含量[J]. 化学工程师, 2020, 34(4): 28−30. doi: 10.16247/j.cnki.23-1171/tq.20200428
Zhou W D, Liang J, Zhuo J, et al. Determination of Content of Fluorine Rubber Content of PFOA by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry[J]. Chemical Engineer, 2020, 34(4): 28−30. doi: 10.16247/j.cnki.23-1171/tq.20200428
|
| [34] |
曾广丰, 谢建军, 王璐, 等. 气相色谱-四极杆/飞行时间质谱法快速测定化妆品中全氟和多氟化合物[J]. 质谱学报, 2024, 45(5): 682−690. doi: 10.7538/zpxb.2024.0025
Zeng G F, Xie J J, Wang L, et al. Rapid Detection of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in Cosmetics Using Gas Chromatography-Quadrupole/Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry[J]. Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society, 2024, 45(5): 682−690. doi: 10.7538/zpxb.2024.0025
|
| [35] |
Zhong M M, Wang T L, Qi C D, et al. Automated Online Solid-Phase Extraction Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Investigation for Simultaneous Quantification of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products, and Organophosphorus Flame Retardants in Environmental Waters[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2019, 1602: 350−358. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.06.012
|
| [36] |
Borrull J, Colom A, Fabregas J, et al. A Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Determining 18 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Source and Treated Drinking Water[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2020, 1629: 461485. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461485
|
| [37] |
Liang M, Xian Y P, Wang B, et al. High Throughput Analysis of 21 Perfluorinated Compounds in Drinking Water, Tap Water, River Water and Plant Effluent from Southern China by Supramolecular Solvents-Based Microextraction Coupled with HPLC-Orbitrap HRMS[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 263: 114389. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114389
|
| [38] |
杨愿愿, 李偲琳, 赵建亮, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定水、沉积物和生物样品中57 种全/多氟化合物[J]. 分析化学, 2022, 50(8): 1243−1251. doi: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3820.210621
Yang Y Y, Li S L, Zhao J L, et al. Determination of 57 Kinds of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water, Sediments and Biological Samples by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2022, 50(8): 1243−1251. doi: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3820.210621
|
| [39] |
Liu S Q, Junaid M, Zhong W, et al. A Sensitive Method for Simultaneous Determination of 12 Classes of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Groundwater by Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Quadrupole Orbitrap High Resolution Mass Spectrometry[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 251: 126327. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126327
|
| [40] |
钱佳浩, 朱清禾, 万江, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定土壤中18 种全氟和多氟烷基化合物[J]. 分析测试学报, 2022, 41(3): 319−326. doi: 10.19969/j.fxcsxb.21072602
Qian J H, Zhu Q H, Wan J, et al. Determination of 18 Perfluorinated and Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in Soil by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2022, 41(3): 319−326. doi: 10.19969/j.fxcsxb.21072602
|
| [41] |
刘明睿, 汪伶俐, 陈亮. 超高效液相色谱串联质谱法快速测定地下水和含水层介质中16 种全氟烷基酸[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(4): 307−314. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2019.5.32
Liu M R, Wang L L, Chen L. Quick Analysis of Sixteen PFAAs in Groundwater and Aquifer by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(4): 307−314. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2019.5.32
|
| [42] |
Olomukoro A A, Emmons R V, Godage N H, et al. Ion Exchange Solid Phase Microextraction Coupled to Liquid Chromatography/Laminar Flow Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Water Samples[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2021, 1651: 462335. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462335
|
| [43] |
史丽, 王兴, 杨艳, 等. 固相萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱检测污水中14种全氟化合物[J]. 化学研究与应用, 2024, 36(3): 647−654.
Shi L, Wang X, Yang Y, et al. Detection of 14 Perfluorinated Compounds in Wastewater Based on Solid Phase Extraction-High Performance Liquid Chromato-Graphy-Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J]. Chemical Research and Application, 2024, 36(3): 647−654.
|
| [44] |
罗佳, 杨海兵, 张秋萍, 等. 超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱法快速测定人体血清中12种传统和新型全氟化合物的含量[J/OL]. 理化检验(化学分册)(2024-06-06)[2024-08-12]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1337.TB.20240605.1755.002.
Luo J, Yang H B, Zhang Q P, et al. Rapid Determination of 12 Traditional and Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Human Serum by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J/OL]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part B: Chemical Analysis) (2024-06-06)[2024-08-12]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1337.TB.20240605.1755.002.
|
| [45] |
赵陈晨, 陈勇, 侯晓玲, 等. 在线固相萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱法直接测定水中15种全氟烷基化合物[J]. 中国环境监测, 2024, 40(2): 185−197. doi: 10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2024.02.21
Zhao C C, Chen Y, Hou X L, et al. Direct Determination of 15 Kinds of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Water by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Online Solid Phase Extraction[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2024, 40(2): 185−197. doi: 10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2024.02.21
|
| [46] |
王帆, 吴婧, 庄意如, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定大气中18种全氟和多氟烷基化合物[J]. 分析化学, 2023, 51(8): 1371−1383. doi: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3
Wang F, Wu J, Zhuang Y R, et al. Determination of 18 Kinds of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Atmosphere by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 51(8): 1371−1383. doi: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3
|
| [47] |
申楠, 韩同竹, 盛璨璨, 等. 在线固相萃取净化-液相色谱-串联质谱法直接测定植物粗提物中的23种全氟化合物[J]. 分析化学, 2024, 52(2): 286−300. doi: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3820.231167
Shen N, Han T Z, Sheng C C, et al. Direct Determination of 23 Kinds of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Crude Plant Extracts by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Online Solid Phase Extraction[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2024, 52(2): 286−300. doi: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3820.231167
|
| [48] |
邬晶晶, 桂萍, 郭风巧. 固相萃取-UPLC-MS/MS法测定水中17种全氟化合物[J]. 中国给水排水, 2022, 38(12): 28−36. doi: 10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2022.12.005
Wu J J, Gui P, Guo F Q. SPE-UPLC-MS/MS for Determination of 17 PFCs in Water[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2022, 38(12): 28−36. doi: 10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2022.12.005
|
| [49] |
石刚, 凌婷, 李慧玲, 等. 高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定医用口罩中8种全氟化合物[J]. 分析科学学报, 2024, 40(1): 50−56. doi: 10.13526/j.issn.1006-6144.2024.01.008
Shi G, Lin T, Li H L, et al. Determination of 8 Perfluorinated Compounds in Medical Mask by HPLC-MS/MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Science, 2024, 40(1): 50−56. doi: 10.13526/j.issn.1006-6144.2024.01.008
|
| [50] |
Yang C, Lee H K, Zhang Y, et al. In situ Detection and Imaging of PFOS in Mouse Kidney by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 91(14): 8783−8788. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00711
|
| [51] |
Ahmed E, Xiao D, Dumlao M C, et al. Nanosecond Pulsed Dielectric Barrier Discharge Ionization Mass Spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 92(6): 4468−4474. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05491
|
| [52] |
郭庆伟, 王倩, 张海东, 等. 新污染物检测技术研究进展[J]. 化学通报, 2024, 87(1): 78−75. doi: 10.14159/j.cnki.0441-3776.2024.01.003
Guo Q W, Wang Q, Zhang H D, et al. Research Progress in Detection Technology of Emerging Pollutants[J]. Chemistry Bulletin, 2024, 87(1): 78−75. doi: 10.14159/j.cnki.0441-3776.2024.01.003
|
| [53] |
Wang Z, Buser A M, Cousins I T, et al. A New OECD Definition for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55: 15575−15578. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c06896
|
| [54] |
Olson K L, Rinehart K L, Cook J C, et al. Phosphazenes: High Molecular Weight Reference Compounds for Field Desorption Mass Spectrometry[J]. Biomedical Mass Spectrometry, 1977, 4: 284−290. doi: 10.1002/bms.1200040503
|
| [55] |
Hu J, Lyu Y, Chen H, et al. Integration of Target, Suspect, and Nontarget Screening with Risk Modeling for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Prioritization in Surface Waters[J]. Water Research, 2023, 233: 119735. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119735
|
| [56] |
Shojaei M, Kumar N, Guelfo J L. An Integrated Approach for Determination of Total Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2022, 56(20): 14517−14527. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c05143
|
| [57] |
Nganda A, Kumar M, Uday V, et al. EI/IOT of PFCs: Environmental Impacts/Interactions, Occurrences, and Toxicities of Perfluorochemicals[J]. Environmental Research, 2023, 218: 114707. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114707
|
| [58] |
Taylor R B, Sapozhnikova Y. Comparison and Validation of the QuEChERSER Mega-Method for Determination of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Foods by Liquid Chromatography with High-Resolution and Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2022, 1230: 340400. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340400
|
| [59] |
Huerta B, Mchugh B, Regan F. Development and Application of an LC-MS Method to the Determination of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Drinking, Sea and Surface Water Samples[J]. Analytical Methods, 2022, 14(21): 2090−2099. doi: 10.1039/D2AY00300G
|
| [60] |
周画天, 黄帝, 刘晓雨, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定水中两类含氟新污染物[J]. 分析试验室, 2024, 43(12): 1655−1661. doi: 10.13595/j.cnki.issn1000-0720.2023100804
Zhou H T, Huang D, Liu X Y, et al. Simultaneous Determination of Two Types of Emerging Fluorinated Pollutants in Water by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory, 2024, 43(12): 1655−1661. doi: 10.13595/j.cnki.issn1000-0720.2023100804
|
| [61] |
唐韵熙, 白亚敏, 刘露露, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定动物源性食品中21种全氟类化合物残留[J]. 食品与机械, 2023, 39(7): 29−39. doi: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2022.81188
Tang Y X, Bai Y M, Liu L L, et al. Simultaneous Determination of 21 Perfluorinated Compounds in Animal-Derived Food by UPLC-MS/MS[J]. Food and Machinery, 2023, 39(7): 29−39. doi: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2022.81188
|
| [62] |
宋新力, 王宁, 何飞燕, 等. 碳纳米管复合材料结合分散固相萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法检测环境水样中痕量全氟化合物[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(5): 409−416. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09016
Song X L, Wang N, He F Y, et al. Determination of Trace Perfluorinated Compounds in Environmental Water Samples by Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Using Carbon Nanotube Composite Materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(5): 409−416. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09016
|
| [63] |
乔肖翠, 赵兴茹, 郭睿, 等. 典型岩溶区水环境中全氟化合物分布特征及风险评价[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(12): 2148−2156. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2019.03.05
Qiao X C, Zhao X R, Guo R, et al. Distribution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water Environment in Typical Karst Region[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(12): 2148−2156. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2019.03.05
|
| [64] |
金梦, 刘丽君, 赵波, 等. 长三角地区水体中全氟化合物的污染特征及风险评价[J]. 环境化学, 2023, 42(7): 2153−2162. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2022022002
Jin M, Liu L J, Zhao B, et al. Pollution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Surface Water from Yangtze River Delta[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2023, 42(7): 2153−2162. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2022022002
|
| [65] |
温祥洁, 王若男, 钟亚萍, 等. 成都市某工业园区及周围表层土壤中全氟化合物的分布特征与风险评估[J]. 环境化学, 2024, 43(4): 1292−1303. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2022101104
Wen X J, Wang R N, Zhong Y P, et al. Distribution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Surface Soils in and Around an Industrial Park in Chengdu[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2024, 43(4): 1292−1303. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2022101104
|
| [66] |
温祥洁, 陈朝辉, 徐维新, 等. 青藏高原东北部地区表层土壤中全氟化合物的分布特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(6): 3253−3261. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202110139
Wen X J, Chen Z H, Xu W X, et al. Distribution Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Surface Soils of the Northeast Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(6): 3253−3261. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202110139
|
| [67] |
武倩倩, 吴强, 宋帅, 等. 天津市主要河流和土壤中全氟化合物空间分布、来源及风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(8): 3682−3694. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202012044
Wu Q Q, Wu Q, Song S, et al. Distribution, Sources, and Risk Assessment of Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Main Rivers and Soils of Tianjin[J]. Environmental Science, 2021, 42(8): 3682−3694. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202012044
|
| [68] |
张红霞, 张洪昌, 胡双庆, 等. 太浦河水体和沉积物中24种全氟化合物分布特征[J]. 环境化学, 2024, 43(3): 722−733. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2022090704
Zhang H X, Zhang H C, Hu S Q, et al. Distribution Characteristics of 24 Perfluorocarbons in Taipu River and Sediments[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2024, 43(3): 722−733. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2022090704
|
| [69] |
黄家浩, 吴玮, 黄天寅, 等. 骆马湖表层水和沉积物中全氟化合物赋存特征、来源及健康风险评估[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(7): 3562−3574. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202108335
Huang J H, Wu W, Huang T Y, et al. Characteristics, Sources, and Risk Assessment of Perlyfluoroalkyl Substances in Surface Water and Sediment of Luoma Lake[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(7): 3562−3574. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202108335
|
| [70] |
Zhang C, Hopkins Z, McCord J, et al. Fate of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Ether Acids in the Total Oxidizable Precursor Assay and Implications for the Analysis of Impacted Water[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2019, 6(11): 662−668. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00525
|
| [71] |
Ateia M, Chiang D, Cashman M, et al. Total Oxidizable Precursor (TOP) Assay-Best Practices, Capabilities and Limitations for PFAS Site Investigation and Remediation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2023, 10(4): 292−301. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00061
|
| [72] |
Place B J, Field J A. Identification of Novel Fluorochemicals in Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Used by the US Military[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(13): 7120−7127. doi: 10.1021/es301465n
|
| [73] |
D’Agostino L A, Mabury S A. Identification of Novel Fluorinated Surfactants in Aqueous Film Forming Foams and Commercial Surfactant Concentrates[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(1): 121−129. doi: 10.1021/es403729e
|
| [74] |
Trier X, Granby K, Christensen J H. Polyfluorinated Surfactants (PFS) in Paper and Board Coatings for Food Packaging[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2011, 18(7): 1108−1120. doi: 10.1007/s11356-010-0439-3
|
| [75] |
Liu Y, D’Agostino L A, Qu G, et al. High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) Methods for Nontarget Discovery and Characterization of Poly- and Per-Fluoroalkyltances (PFASs) in Environmental and Human Samples[J]. TRAC-Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 121: 115420. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.02.021
|
| [76] |
营娇龙, 秦晓鹏, 郎杭, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定水体中37种典型抗生素[J]. 岩矿测试, 2022, 41(3): 394−403. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202111060168
Ying J L, Qin X P, Lang H, et al. Determination of 37 Typical Antibiotics by Liquid Chromatography-Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(3): 394−403. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202111060168
|
Competent Authorities：China Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by：Geological Society of China; National Research Center for Geoanalysis
Address：No. 26 Baiwanzhuang Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100037, China Email：ykcs_zazhi@163.com Tel：010-68999562
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
京公网安备 11010202008159号
DownLoad: