WU Jiayi, HE Daxiang, LYU Peng, LIU Fangyuan, LI Bocai, PAN Zhiqiang, XIANG Fangyihang, TANG Youjun. Comparative Application of Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of Sterane and Terpane Compounds in Petroleum Geological SamplesJ. Rock and Mineral Analysis. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202504270105
Citation: WU Jiayi, HE Daxiang, LYU Peng, LIU Fangyuan, LI Bocai, PAN Zhiqiang, XIANG Fangyihang, TANG Youjun. Comparative Application of Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of Sterane and Terpane Compounds in Petroleum Geological SamplesJ. Rock and Mineral Analysis. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202504270105

Comparative Application of Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of Sterane and Terpane Compounds in Petroleum Geological Samples

  • Sterane and terpane compounds are key biomarkers in petroleum geochemistry to identify organic matter sources, depositional environments, and thermal evolution. The reliability of their analysis directly affects the accuracy of oil-source correlation and maturity assessment. This study compares GC-MS and GC-MS/MS in analyzing sterane and terpane compounds, focusing on the parameter characteristics and their geological significance. Using Single Ion Monitoring (SIM) and Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) to obtain parameters, sterane triangular plots and ratio parameters were employed for comprehensive evaluation. Results show consistent identification of organic matter sources, indicating mixed-source input dominated by lower aquatic organisms. The average differences in C29-20S/(20S + 20R), C29-αββ/(ααα + αββ), and C27-αββ/(ααα + αββ) measurements were all less than 0.05, with overall trends consistent across both methods. Notably, GC-MS/MS yields C29-20S/(20S + 20R) values closer to the evolutionary endpoint (~0.55), which align better with the measured vitrinite reflectance (Ro) values (0.84% – 1.40%). For terpane parameters, GC-MS/MS shows an average Ts/Tm value approximately 0.18 – 0.28 higher than GC-MS, and a lower Ga/C30H value by approximately 0.11 – 0.12, yet both methods maintain consistency in depositional environment identification and maturity trends. In conclusion, while GC-MS remains valuable for routine sterane and terpane analysis, GC-MS/MS offers higher accuracy in maturity assessment for high maturity or complex matrix samples by enhancing selectivity and resolution, providing more reliable technical support for fine-scale geochemical analysis of sterane and terpane compounds.

  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return