Citation: | XU Xinning,WANG Shuo,XU Juan,et al. Research Progress on the Geological Application of a Flow-Through Time-Resolved Analysis System[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis,2025,44(1):1−18. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202304130048 |
FT-TRA is a rapid reaction (dissolution)-on-line analysis system newly developed in the early 21st century. It consists of an eluent mixing unit, a reaction unit and an analysis unit. Its core function is to wash trace samples in the sample reactor with a specific mobile phase, separate or remove specific components in the sample, and monitor the exsolution characteristics of different elements and mineral components of the sample to achieve high resolution online process analysis. In this article, the technical principle, hardware and software composition, experimental method, operation key points and geological application development process of the FT-TRA system are reviewed. The controversial points in the geological application of the system are explained and analyzed, and its future development direction and potential are forecasted based on its development status. At present, the main geological applications of this system include the verification of proxy indicators for paleoceanography and paleo-environment research (such as foraminifera and ostracod leaching), the study of the mineral dissolution process and reaction kinetics, and the analysis of the elemental phase of environmental samples. The dissolution mechanism of different components involved in the operation of the FT-TRA system is an important problem to be solved in its application process. Further improvement of its dissolution dynamics principle will inevitably provide more new ideas for the future development of the system, such as multi-type geological sample dissolution and mineral simulation synthesis. The BRIEF REPORT is available for this paper at http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.ykcs.202304130048.
The flow-through time-resolved analysis system (FT-TRA) system, developed in the early 21st century, is a rapid reaction-analysis tool designed to dissolve, separate, or remove targeted components in natural samples using a specific mobile phase (reaction liquid or eluent) [1]. It was created to support the development and verification of geochemical proxies related to paleo-ocean and paleo-environment studies and to address geochemical dynamic processes. Currently, the FT-TRA system is mainly used for cleaning and dissolving microbiological shells, like those of foraminifera and ostracods, and for monitoring their exsolution components as indicators of paleo-oceanographic and paleoenvironmental conditions. It has also proven useful for measuring dissolution parameters of minerals like forsterite[2-4] and testing mineral reactivity[5]. The system’s key advantages are its “flow response” and “real-time monitoring” capabilities, though understanding the dissolution mechanisms of different components remains a challenge.
Since the FT-TRA system is currently in a self-fabricated stage and lacks commercial availability, it has not yet been widely adopted by the scientific community, especially in China, where foundational research is limited. In recent years, our research team has collaborated with international experts to pioneer the system’s development and conduct exploratory studies. To promote its broader application in China, this article reviews the system’s technical principles, hardware and software components, experimental methods, operational procedures, and application development, while also analyzing the current challenges in its use.
1. Main technical principles and components of FT-TRA
The FT-TRA system is an integrated platform designed around the principles of “flow cleaning (dissolution) and real-time monitoring”. It comprises three primary components: an eluent mixing unit, a reaction unit, and an analysis unit. The eluent mixing unit regulates the composition and concentration of the eluent, which is then continuously introduced into the reaction unit containing the solid sample. The resulting product from this reaction is mixed with an internal standard in a tee and subsequently directed to the analysis unit for measurement.
The core hardware components of the FT-TRA system include the gradient pump, the reaction cell, and the analytical instrument (or fraction collector). In offline test mode, the fraction collector is employed to sample the continuous flow at regular intervals. In online test mode, the eluate after reaction is continuously pumped into the analytical instrument, which measures and provides component information at fixed time intervals. This data acquisition is integrated with the time-resolved analysis (TRA) mode of quadrupole-ICP-MS to facilitate comprehensive analysis.
2. Experimental methods of FT-TRA system for geological sample analysis
The stability and reproducibility of the FT-TRA system are fundamental to ensuring the accuracy and reliability of test data, with appropriate standard samples serving as crucial evaluation tools. For FT-TRA, the selection criteria for standard samples should include: (1) solid standard samples; (2) homogeneity; and (3) alignment with the main mineral composition of the geological samples being studied. Currently, there is no standardized sample universally adopted for this system. For instance, in the study of foraminifera using FT-TRA, standard samples utilized include North American Shale (NASC)[1], NIST 1c Marl[18], PDB[19], and ECRM752-1 Limestone[20-23]. These selected standard samples generally exhibit chemical compositions similar to the study samples and are widely used in elemental analysis. Given that samples with varying physical and chemical properties impact FT-TRA stability differently, it is essential to thoroughly explore and evaluate different types of geological samples by selecting appropriate standard samples before conducting formal testing.
The FT-TRA system is applicable to the dissolution and compositional analysis of various solid samples, primarily including biological shell samples and mineral samples, each requiring distinct selection and preparation procedures. In paleo-oceanographic and paleo-environmental studies, foraminifera, ostracod, and other biological shells are analyzed to serve as proxies. For these applications, it is crucial to ensure that sample size and quantity are controlled to maintain data comparability and to accurately obtain the original shell information while avoiding interference from secondary components. Therefore, before conducting FT-TRA dissolution tests on biological shells, samples should be meticulously selected based on size, quantity, and completeness through microscopic characterization and cleaned according to the specific experimental objectives[1,7,19-20,24-26]. In mineralogy, the FT-TRA system is primarily used to assess mineral dissolution parameters and reactivity. To explore dissolution kinetic parameters, the pre-treatment process typically involves grinding, cleaning, verifying mineral phase purity, determining stoichiometric numbers, and measuring surface area. For studies on mineral reactivity, the pre-treatment procedures should be tailored to align with the specific goals of the experiment.
The analysis mode and adjustment of test parameters for the ICP-MS and FT-TRA systems are critical application aspects, with the sample flow rate being a particularly significant parameter. The sample flow rate is governed by the eluate flow rate within the reaction cell, which in turn influences the dissolution kinetics of the sample[4]. A flow rate that is too high may prevent adequate contact between the sample and the eluate, leading to incomplete reactions, while a flow rate that is too low can cause the dissolution products to accumulate in the reaction cell, thereby not accurately reflecting the real-time dissolution of chemical components. Existing literature lacks detailed recommendations on optimal flow rates. Currently, Haley et al.[1] reported that the eluate flow rate entering the sample pool was set at 4mL/min but did not provide a detailed rationale for this choice. In our laboratory, we conducted exploratory experiments using dilute nitric acid (pH=2) to dissolve foraminifera shells at various flow rates. The results of these experiments are illustrated in Fig.4, although the underlying mechanisms require further investigation.
3. Progress in geological application of FT-TRA
The FT-TRA system was developed from the study of foraminifera leaching and the verification of environmental proxies. Sedimentary foraminifera are central to paleo-oceanographic and paleo-environmental research. An essential requirement for accurately extracting paleo-ocean and paleo-environmental information from foraminifera is to obtain biogenic calcite data formed during the organism’s lifetime, while minimizing interference from post-burial pollution and secondary composition[41]. To address this, Boyle et al.[42] introduced the traditional batch method in the 20th century, which has since undergone continuous refinement and optimization[26,29,42-44]. Although this method can somewhat remove contaminants, it often results in sample loss and poor reproducibility due to extended cleaning times and manual handling. Moreover, it is challenging to verify the complete removal of contaminants and to distinguish between original and secondary calcite. In response to these limitations, Haley et al.[1] from Oregon State University designed the FT-TRA system in the early 21st century. This system enables real-time monitoring of the cleaning process for foraminifera shells, helps prevent the loss of key mineral phases, and mitigates the re-adsorption of rare earth elements during dissolution[6]. Experimental results demonstrate that the FT-TRA system effectively monitors the cleaning process of foraminifera in real time and can adjust for contamination based on concentration fluctuations of elements such as Al and Fe during dissolution (Fig.5). Furthermore, the system is capable of differential dissolution according to the solubility of different mineral phases, thereby facilitating the extraction of the most original biological calcite information.
However, further studies by other teams found that the kinetic behavior of foraminifera shell dissolution was complex, and more rigorous controlled experimental methods were designed to investigate the cleaning and “differential dissolution” effects of the FT-TRA system. Compared with the traditional batch method and in situ methods such as EPMA, SEM and SIMS, there is no selective dissolution of Mg-enriched components of foraminifera shell under natural environmental or laboratory simulation conditions, and the samples follow the dissolution order from outside to inside in most cases. Although these conclusions affirm the reliability and convenience of the FT-TRA system in the rapid analysis of foraminifera composition[53,56-58], they also reveal the complexity of the application of the FT-TRA system to biological shell leaching and component analysis.
Subsequently, de Baere[4]explored the dissolution characteristics of two different minerals, forsterite and calcite, within the FT-TRA system, explaining the dissolution kinetics model from both theoretical and experimental perspectives. de Baere[2]conducted targeted experiments using calcite and aragonite to test the ideas of Haley and Klinkhammer[1], confirming that the FT-TRA system has limitations in achieving differential dissolution of foraminifera and distinguishing between calcite of different origins. However, the study also demonstrated the system’s applicability in measuring mineral dissolution rates, dissolution parameters, and stoichiometry under both steady-state and transient leaching conditions. It proved that the FT-TRA system can be an effective supplementary tool for studying mineral dissolution.
As the dissolution kinetics theory within the FT-TRA system gradually improved, the system began to be used to explore the potential of ostracod shells as paleoenvironmental indicators[22,71-72]. Additionally, Power et al.[5] utilized a NaCl solution equilibrated with CO2 gas as a leachate to test the reactivity of tailings with CO2 in the FT-TRA system, aiming to assess the potential of these deposits to sequester CO2 by directly capturing it from the atmosphere. This research aligns with international academic trends and offers an innovative approach to the application of the FT-TRA system, holding significant practical significance and reference value.
4. Summary and outlook
The FT-TRA system exhibits certain unique features in the extraction of paleo-environmental and paleo-oceanographic signals, as well as in the testing of mineral dissolution parameters. However, its major limitation lies in the lack of a comprehensive theoretical foundation. Currently, the only available theory is de Baere’s[2] proposition of differential dissolution states of phases with varying solubility within the FT-TRA system, but this theory still fails to fully explain all the phenomena observed in experiments. Future research should focus on a deeper exploration of the dissolution mechanisms within the FT-TRA system. Potential development directions include the dissolution of various geological or synthetic samples, the synthetic modeling of minerals, and the integration of FT-TRA with multiple analytical instruments, including isotope analysis tools.
[1] |
Haley B A, Klinkhammer G P. Development of a flow-through system for cleaning and dissolving foraminiferal tests[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 185(1): 51−69. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00399-0
|
[2] |
de Baere B. Investigating mineral dissolution kinetics by flow-through time-resolved analysis (FT-TRA)[D]. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia, 2015: 294.
|
[3] |
de Baere B, François R, Mayer K U. Measuring mineral dissolution kinetics using on-line flow-through time resolved analysis (FT-TRA): An exploratory study with forsterite[J]. Chemical Geology, 2015, 413: 107−118. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.08.024
|
[4] |
de Baere B, Molins S, Mayer K U, et al. Determination of mineral dissolution regimes using flow-through time-resolved analysis (FT-TRA) and numerical simulation[J]. Chemical Geology, 2016, 430: 1−12. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.03.014
|
[5] |
Power I M, Dipple G M, Bradshaw P M D, et al. Prospects for CO2 mineralization and enhanced weathering of ultramafic mine tailings from the Baptiste nickel deposit in British Columbia, Canada[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 94: 102895. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102895
|
[6] |
Haley B A, Klinkhammer G P, Mix A C. Revisiting the rare earth elements in foraminiferal tests[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 239(1): 79−97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2005.08.014
|
[7] |
Benway H M, Haley B A, Klinkhammer G P, et al. Adaptation of a flow-through leaching procedure for Mg/Ca paleothermometry[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2003, 4(2): 15. doi: 10.1029/2002GC000312
|
[8] |
Nürnberg D, Bijma J, Hemleben C. Assessing the reliability of magnesium in foraminiferal calcite as a proxy for water mass temperatures[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1996, 60(5): 803−814. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00446-7
|
[9] |
Lea D W, Pak D K, Spero H J. Climate impact of late Quaternary equatorial Pacific Sea surface temperature variations[J]. Science, 2000, 289(5485): 1719−1724. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1719
|
[10] |
王朔. 新型FT-TRA系统研制及其对有孔虫元素分析的古环境意义初探[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2022.
Wang S. An improved FT-TRA system and its paleoenvironmental implications for elemental analysis of foraminifera[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2022.
|
[11] |
王天锋. 制备液相色谱仪自动控制系统的研究与设计[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2012.
Wang T F. Study and design of automatic control system based on preparative liquid chromatographic instrument[D]. Suzhou: Suzhou University, 2012.
|
[12] |
江林, 周建, 张晓辉, 等. 三维全自动馏分收集器的研制[J]. 现代科学仪器, 2008(2): 8−9, 20.
Jiang L, Zhou J, Zhang X H, et al. Development of three dimensions automatic fraction collector[J]. Modern Scientific Instruments, 2008(2): 8−9, 20.
|
[13] |
魏莉, 张焜, 方岩雄, 等. 制备型高效液相色谱技术的研究进展[J]. 广东化工, 2005(11): 5−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1865.2005.11.002
Wei L, Zhang K, Fang Y X, et al. The development of preparative high performance liquid chromatography[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2005(11): 5−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1865.2005.11.002
|
[14] |
Siewers U. Inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry in geochemistry[J]. Microchimica Acta, 1989, 99(3): 365−372. doi: 10.1007/BF01244692
|
[15] |
吴石头, 黄超, 谢烈文, 等. Iolite软件和基体归一化100%(m/m)定量校准策略处理激光剥蚀-电感耦合等离子体质谱元素含量信号[J]. 分析化学, 2018, 46(10): 1628−1636. doi: 10.11895/j.issn.0253-3820.181291
Wu S T, Huang C, Xie L W, et al. Iolite based bulk normalization as 100% m/m quantification strategy for reduction of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry transient signal[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 46(10): 1628−1636. doi: 10.11895/j.issn.0253-3820.181291
|
[16] |
吴石头, 王亚平, 许春雪. 激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱元素微区分析标准物质研究进展[J]. 岩矿测试, 2015, 34(5): 503−511. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.05.002
Wu S T, Wang Y P, Xu C X. Research progress on reference materials for in situ elemental analysis by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2015, 34(5): 503−511. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.05.002
|
[17] |
杜宝华, 盛迪波, 罗志翔, 等. 低压密闭消解-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定地质样品中的硼[J]. 岩矿测试, 2020, 39(5): 690−698. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201909250139
Du B H, Sheng D B, Luo Z X, et al. Determination of boron in geological samples by ICP-OES with low-pressure closed digestion[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2020, 39(5): 690−698. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201909250139
|
[18] |
Klinkhammer G P, Haley B A, Mix A C, et al. Evaluation of automated flow-through time-resolved analysis of foraminifera for Mg/Ca paleothermometry[J]. Paleoceanography, 2004, 19: 4030. doi: 10.1029/2004PA001050
|
[19] |
Klinkhammer G P, Mix A C, Haley B A. Increased dissolved terrestrial input to the coastal ocean during the last deglaciation[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2009, 10(3): 1−11. doi: 10.1029/2008GC002219
|
[20] |
Mckay C L, Groeneveld J, Filipsson H L, et al. A comparison of benthic foraminiferal Mn/Ca and sedimentary Mn/Al as proxies of relative bottom-water oxygenation in the low-latitude NE Atlantic upwelling system[J]. Biogeosciences, 2015, 12: 5415−5428. doi: 10.5194/bg-12-5415-2015
|
[21] |
Haarmann T, Hathorne E C, Mohtadi M, et al. Mg/Ca ratios of single planktonic foraminifer shells and the potential to reconstruct the thermal seasonality of the water column[J]. Paleoceanography, 2011, 26(3): 1−14. doi: 10.1029/2010PA002091
|
[22] |
Börner N, de Baere B, Francois R, et al. Application of flow-through time-resolved analysis (FT-TRA) to isolate the elemental composition in ostracod calcite[J]. Chemical Geology, 2017, 467: 53−63. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.07.019
|
[23] |
Torres M E, Martin R A, Klinkhammer G P, et al. Post depositional alteration of foraminiferal shells in cold seep settings: New insights from flow-through time-resolved analyses of biogenic and inorganic seep carbonates[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2010, 299(1): 10−22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2010.07.048
|
[24] |
Guo X, Xu B, Burnett W C, et al. A potential proxy for seasonal hypoxia: LA-ICP-MS Mn/Ca ratios in benthic foraminifera from the Yangtze River Estuary[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2018, 245: 290−303. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2018.11.007
|
[25] |
Koho K A, de Nooijer L J, Reichart G J. Combining benthic foraminiferal ecology and shell Mn/Ca to deconvolve past bottom water oxygenation and paleoproductivity[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2015, 165: 294−306. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2015.06.003
|
[26] |
Kraft S, Frank M, Hathorne E C, et al. Assessment of seawater Nd isotope signatures extracted from foraminiferal shells and authigenic phases of gulf of Guinea sediments[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2013, 121: 414−435. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.07.029
|
[27] |
Parkhurst D L, Appelo C A J. Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3: A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations[R].U. S. Geological Survey, 2013.
|
[28] |
Longerich H P, Jackson S E, Günther D. Inter-laboratory note. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric transient signal data acquisition and analyte concentration calculation[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 1996, 11(9): 899−904. doi: 10.1039/JA9961100899
|
[29] |
Barker S, Greaves M, Elderfield H. A study of cleaning procedures used for foraminiferal Mg/Ca paleothermometry[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2003, 4(9): 1−20. doi: 10.1029/2003GC000559
|
[30] |
Rosenthal Y, Lear C H, Oppo D W, et al. Temperature and carbonate ion effects on Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratios in benthic foraminifera: Aragonitic species Hoeglundina elegans[J]. Paleoceanography, 2006, 21(1): 1−14. doi: 10.1029/2005pa001158
|
[31] |
Rona P A, McGregor B A, Betzer P R, et al. Anomalous water temperatures over Mid-Atlantic Ridge crest at 26° north latitude[J]. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 1975, 22(9): 611−618. doi: 10.1016/0011-7471(75)90048-0
|
[32] |
Elderfield H, Ganssen G. Past temperature and 18O of surface ocean waters inferred from foraminiferal Mg/Ca ratios[J]. Nature, 2000, 405: 442−445. doi: 10.1038/35013033
|
[33] |
Hastings D W, Russell A D, Emerson S R. Foraminiferal magnesium in Globeriginoides sacculifer as a paleotemperature proxy[J]. Paleoceanography, 1998, 13(2): 161−169. doi: 10.1029/97PA03147
|
[34] |
Reichart G J, Jorissen F, Anschutz P, et al. Single foraminiferal test chemistry records the marine environment[J]. Geology, 2003, 31(4): 355−358. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0355:SFTCRT>2.0.CO;2
|
[35] |
Bender M L, Lorens R B, Williams D F. Sodium, magnesium and strontium in the tests of planktonic foraminifera[J]. Micropaleontology, 1975, 21(4): 448−459. doi: 10.2307/1485293
|
[36] |
Russell A D, Honisch B, Spero H J, et al. Effects of seawater carbonate ion concentration and temperature on shell U, Mg, and Sr in cultured planktonic foraminifera[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2004, 68(21): 4347−4361. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.03.013
|
[37] |
Yu J M, Elderfield H, Honisch B. B/Ca in planktonic foraminifera as a proxy for surface seawater pH[J]. Paleoceanography, 2007, 22(2): 1−17. doi: 10.1029/2006pa001347
|
[38] |
Russell A D, Emerson S, Nelson B K, et al. Uranium in foraminiferal calcite as a recorder of seawater uranium concentrations[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1994, 58(2): 671−681. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90497-9
|
[39] |
Hastings D W, Emerson S R, Erez J, et al. Vanadium in foraminiferal calcite: Evaluation of a method to determine paleo-seawater vanadium concentrations[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1996, 60(19): 3701−3715. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00196-2
|
[40] |
Misra S, Froelich P N. Lithium isotope history of Cenozoic seawater: Changes in silicate weathering and reverse weathering[J]. Science, 2012, 335: 818−823. doi: 10.1126/science.1214697
|
[41] |
Brown S J, Elderfield H. Variations in Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratios of planktonic foraminifera caused by postdepositional dissolution: Evidence of shallow Mg-dependent dissolution[J]. Paleoceanography, 1996, 11(5): 543−551. doi: 10.1029/96PA01491
|
[42] |
Boyle E A. Manganese carbonate overgrowths on foraminifera tests[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1983, 47(10): 1815−1819. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(83)90029-7
|
[43] |
Boyle E A. Cadmium, zinc, copper, and barium in foraminifera tests[J]. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 1981, 53(1): 11−35. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(81)90022-4
|
[44] |
Rosenthal Y, Boyle E A, Slowey N. Temperature control on the incorporation of magnesium, strontium, fluorine, and cadmium into benthic foraminiferal shells from Little Bahama Bank: Prospects for thermocline paleoceanography[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1997, 61(17): 3633−3643. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00181-6
|
[45] |
Lea D W, Mashiotta T A, Spero H J. Controls on magnesium and strontium uptake in planktonic foraminifera determined by live culturing[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999, 63(16): 2369−2379. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00197-0
|
[46] |
Palmer M. Rare earth elements in foraminifera tests[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1985, 73(2−4): 285−298. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(85)90077-9
|
[47] |
Delaney M L, Bé A W, Boyle E A. Li, Sr, Mg, and Na in foraminiferal calcite shells from laboratory culture, sediment traps, and sediment cores[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1985, 49(6): 1327−1341. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(85)90284-4
|
[48] |
Goldstein S, O’nions R, Hamilton P. A Sm-Nd isotopic study of atmospheric dusts and particulates from major river systems[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1984, 70(2): 221−236. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(84)90007-4
|
[49] |
Weldeab S, Frank M, Stichel T, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of the West African monsoon during the last deglaciation[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(13): 1−5. doi: 10.1029/2011GL047805
|
[50] |
Rickli J, Frank M, Halliday A N. The hafnium–neodymium isotopic composition of Atlantic seawater[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 280(1−4): 118−127. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2009.01.026
|
[51] |
Bayon G, Birot D, Ruffine L, et al. Evidence for intense REE scavenging at cold seeps from the Niger Delta margin[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 312(3−4): 443−452. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2011.10.008
|
[52] |
Hoogakker B A A, Klinkhammer G P, Elderfield H, et al. Mg/Ca paleothermometry in high salinity environments[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 284(3): 583−589. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2009.05.027
|
[53] |
Boussetta S, Bassinot F, Sabbatini A, et al. Diagenetic Mg-rich calcite in Mediterranean sediments: Quanti-fication and impact on foraminiferal Mg/Ca thermometry[J]. Marine Geology, 2011, 280(1): 195−204. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2010.12.011
|
[54] |
Kısakürek B, Eisenhauer A, Böhm F, et al. Controls on shell Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca in cultured planktonic foraminiferan, Globigerinoides ruber (white)[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2008, 273(3−4): 260−269. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2008.06.026
|
[55] |
Sadekov A, Eggins S M, de Deckker P, et al. Surface and subsurface seawater temperature reconstruction using Mg/Ca microanalysis of planktonic foraminifera Globigerinoides ruber, Globigerinoides sacculifer, and Pulleniatina obliquiloculata[J]. Paleoceanography, 2009, 24(3): 1−17. doi: 10.1029/2008PA001664
|
[56] |
Ferguson J, Henderson G, Kucera M, et al. Systematic change of foraminiferal Mg/Ca ratios across a strong salinity gradient[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2008, 265(1−2): 153−166. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2007.10.011
|
[57] |
Anand P, Elderfield H, Conte M H. Calibration of Mg/Ca thermometry in planktonic foraminifera from a sediment trap time series[J]. Paleoceanography, 2003, 18(2): 1−28. doi: 10.1029/2002PA000846
|
[58] |
Pearson P N, Ditchfield P W, Singano J, et al. Warm tropical sea surface temperatures in the late Cretaceous and Eocene epochs[J]. Nature, 2001, 413(6855): 481−487. doi: 10.1038/35097000
|
[59] |
Sadekov A Y, Eggins S M, Klinkhammer G P, et al. Effects of seafloor and laboratory dissolution on the Mg/Ca composition of Globigerinoides sacculifer and Orbulina universa tests—A laser ablation ICPMS microanalysis perspective[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2010, 292(3): 312−324. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2010.01.039
|
[60] |
Murphy W M, Oelkers E H, Lichtner P C. Surface reaction versus diffusion control of mineral dissolution and growth rates in geochemical processes[J]. Chemical Geology, 1989, 78(3−4): 357−380. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(89)90069-7
|
[61] |
Berner R A. Rate control of mineral dissolution under Earth surface conditions[J]. American Journal of Science, 1978, 278(9): 1235−1252. doi: 10.2475/ajs.278.9.1235
|
[62] |
Morse J W, Arvidson R S. The dissolution kinetics of major sedimentary carbonate minerals[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2002, 58(1−2): 51−84. doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(1)00083-6
|
[63] |
Sjoberg E. Kinetics and mechanism of calcite dissolution in aqueous solutions at low temperature temperatures[J]. Scottish Journal of Geology, 1978, 32: 1−92.
|
[64] |
Plummer L N, Parkhurst D L, Wigley T M L. Critical review of the kinetics of calcite dissolution and precipitation[J]. ACS Symposium Series, 1979, 25: 537−573. doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0093.ch025
|
[65] |
Busenberg E, Plummer L, Mumpton F. A comparative study of the dissolution and crystal growth kinetics of calcite and aragonite[J]. Studies in Diagenesis, 1986, 1578: 139−168.
|
[66] |
Giudici G D. Surface control vs. diffusion control during calcite dissolution: Dependence of step-edge velocity upon solution pH[J]. American Mineralogist, 2002, 87(10): 1279−1285. doi: 10.2138/am-2002-1002
|
[67] |
Chou L, Garrels R M, Wollast R. Comparative study of the kinetics and mechanisms of dissolution of carbonate minerals[J]. Chemical Geology, 1989, 78(3−4): 269−282. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(89)90063-6
|
[68] |
Sjoeberg E L, Rickard D T. Calcite dissolution kinetics: Surface speciation and the origin of the variable pH dependence[J]. Chemical Geology, 1984, 42(1−4): 119−136. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(84)90009-3
|
[69] |
Holmes J A. Nonmarine ostracods as Quaternary palaeoenvironmental indicators[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 1992, 16(4): 405−431. doi: 10.1177/030913339201600402
|
[70] |
Holmes J A. Trace-element and stable-isotope geochemistry of non-marine ostracod shells in Quaternary palaeoenvironmental reconstruction[J]. Journal of Paleolimnology, 1996, 15: 223−235. doi: 10.1007/BF00213042
|
[71] |
Börner N, de Baere B, Akita L G, et al. Stable isotopes and trace elements in modern ostracod shells: Implications for reconstructing past environments on the Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Paleolimnology, 2017, 58(2): 191−211. doi: 10.1007/s10933-017-9971-1
|
[72] |
Rodríguez M, de Baere B, François R, et al. An evaluation of cleaning methods, preservation and specimen stages on trace elements in modern shallow marine ostracod shells of Sinocytheridea impress and their implications as proxies[J]. Chemical Geology, 2021, 579: 120316. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120316
|
[73] |
Yang Q, Jochum K P, Stoll B, et al. Trace element variability in single ostracod valves as a proxy for hydrochemical change in Nam Co, Central Tibet, during the Holocene[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2014, 399: 225−235. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.01.014
|