应用6σ质量管理方法尝试评价多目标样品氯等项目检测质量水平
Trial Application of 6σ Quality Management Method to Evaluate the Quality Level of Detection Items of Multiple-target Geochemical Samples
-
摘要: 应用6σ质量管理方法评价X射线荧光光谱法测定多目标地球化学样品分析中4个日常监控土壤标准物质中Cl、S、总碳、N、Na2O、MgO、Al2O3、SiO2、P、K2O、CaO、Ba、Ti、V、Cr、Mn、TFe2O3、Zn、Ga、Br、Pb、Th、Rb、Sr、Y、Zr、Nb等27个项目检测质量水平。研究结果显示,随着高精度、自动化仪器的应用,多目标样品分析多个项目的精密度、准确度都得到大幅度的提高,部分检测项目的性能已经达到6σ质量水平;但有少数项目如N、总碳、Cr 等低于3σ质量水平,其精密度准确度均需改进,分析性能有待进一步提高,建议更换检测方法。用6σ质量管理方法评价地质实验分析测试质量水平与地质实验室传统质量控制方法得出的结果具有一致性,其评价方法简便、量化、直观、具有一定的应用价值。Abstract: It is the first attempt to apply six sigma (6σ) quality managment method to evaluate the X-ray fluorescence spectrometry detection method for four multi-objective reference substance of soil, which include 27 targets such as Cl, S, total carbon, N, Na2O, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, P, K2O, CaO, Ba, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, TFe2O3, Zn, Ga, Br, Pb, Th, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb. The research result shows that the precision and accuracy of multi-objective analysis with multiple target samples have been improved along with high precision and automatic equipment applications. Some of the items have reached 6σ quality level. But there are a few targets such as N, Total carbon and Cr were lower than 3σ quality level and their precision and accuracy are required to be improved, therefore, recommend to change detection method. Evaluations of geological analysis with 6σ quality management methods are consistent with traditional quality control methods. The evaluation method is simple, quantitative and intuitive with certain practical value.
-
-
刘忠民,高月亭,肖洪广,刘利东,车玉传.6σ质量管理方法在临床实验室质量控制中的应用研究[J].检验医学,2010,25(3):224-227. 中国地质调查局.DD 2005-01,多目标区域地球化学调查规范(1∶250000)[S].2005. 李园园,李萍,黄亨建.应用六西格玛理论评价临床实验室高检验性能及设计质控方案[J].中国医疗器械信息,2007,13(6):9-12. 王治国. 6σ 质量标准在临床实验室质量控制的应用(1)[J].上海医学研究杂志,2002,17(2):125-127. Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, Leigh E, Picaso L, Morgan T. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale [J].Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine,2000,124(4):516-519. Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, Leigh E, Picaso L, Morgan T. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale [J].Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine,2000,124(4):516-519.
Westgard J O. Six sigma quality design and control [M].2nd ed. Madison: Westgard QC,2006:157-184. Westgard J O. Six sigma quality design and control [M].2nd ed. Madison: Westgard QC,2006:157-184.
Westgard J O, Westgard S A. The quality of laboratory testing today: An assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance date from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance[J].American Journal of Clinical Pathology,2006,125(3):343-354. Westgard J O, Westgard S A. The quality of laboratory testing today: An assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance date from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance[J].American Journal of Clinical Pathology,2006,125(3):343-354.
Coskun A.Six sigma and calculaed laboratory tests[J].Clinical Chemistry,2006,52(4):770-771. Coskun A.Six sigma and calculaed laboratory tests[J].Clinical Chemistry,2006,52(4):770-771.
刘忠民,高月亭,陈涛.应用操作过程规范图评价和设计室内质量控制方法[J].医学实验室与临床,2007,14(4):770-771. Westgard J O, Westgard S A. Equivalent quality testing versus equivalent QC procedures [J].Laboratory Medicine,2005,36(10):626-629. Westgard J O, Westgard S A. Equivalent quality testing versus equivalent QC procedures [J].Laboratory Medicine,2005,36(10):626-629.
黄永富,杭杲,刘春霞.6σ管理方法在临床实验室分析前质量控制中的应用研究[J].检验医学,2008,23(4):417-420. 叶家瑜,姚岚.区域地球化学调查样品分析质量控制方法探讨[J].岩矿测试,2004,23(2):137-142.
计量
- 文章访问数: 1482
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 1263
下载:
京公网安备 11010202008159号