• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • DOAJ 收录
  • Scopus 收录

电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定膨润土中的交换性阳离子钙镁钾钠

Determination of Exchangeable Cations of Ca, Mg, K and Na in Bentonite by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry

  • 摘要: 对膨润土交换性阳离子和阳离子交换容量的测试是评价膨润土矿的主要指标之一,传统的测定膨润土交换性阳离子通常采用原子吸收光谱法或容量法,操作手续复杂繁琐。本文用氯化铵-乙醇交换液交换出试样中的可交换性阳离子钙、镁、钾、钠,分取蒸至湿盐状,制备成盐酸介质的溶液,电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定。通过正交试验确定了最佳实验条件为交换1次,加入25 mL交换液,搅拌30 min,沉淀洗涤2次。分别选择315.887 nm、279.079 nm、766.490 nm、589.592 nm作为钙、镁、钾、钠的分析谱线,绘制的标准曲线中钾、钠的浓度在0~0.6 mmol/L,钙、镁的浓度在0~3.0 mmol/L呈良好的线性关系。方法检出限为0.012~0.048 mmol/100 g。经国家标准物质验证,测定值与标准值吻合,精密度为0.5%~2.5%(RSD,n=11),准确度为-6.1%~10%,加标回收率为97.0%~100.0%。本方法样品处理方法程序简单快速,分析重现性好,克服了传统分析方法测定手续繁琐、时间冗长且成本高等缺点,适用于批量样品的分析。

     

    Abstract: Bentonite exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity is one of the main indicators of the evaluation of bentonite mineral. The traditional measurement method of bentonite exchangeable cations was made by using either atomic absorption spectrometry or the volumetric method and involved complicated operating procedures and took a long time. In this paper, a description of how the exchangeable cations of Ca, Mg, K and Na were extracted by NH4Cl-ethanol exchange liquid is given. The obtained solution was evaporated to wet salt and dissolved by 5% (by volume) of HCl acid solution, which was ready to be determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) for exchangeable cations of Ca, Mg, K and Na. The optimal conditions for the exchange were achieved by adding 25 mL exchange liquid, stirring for 30 min and washing the precipitate twice, then studied by orthogonal experiment. The analysis spectral lines of 315.887 nm, 279.079 nm, 766.490 nm and 589.592 nm were selected for Ca, Mg, K and Na, respectively. Based on the working curves, K and Na have a good linear relationship from 0 to 0.6 mmol/L, Ca and Mg from 0 to 3.0 mmol/L. The method detection limit was 0.012-0.048 mmol/100 g. Verified with national standard materials, the measured values and the certified values were in good agreement. Precision (RSD, n=11) ranged from 0.5% to 2.5%, and accuracies (RE) ranged from -6.1% to 10%. The recoveries with spike were from 97.0% to 100.0%. The proposed method overcame the disadvantages of the traditional analysis, as mentioned above. This simple and fast sample handling method before measurement with good reproducibility is applicable to the analysis of bulk samples.

     

/

返回文章
返回