• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • DOAJ 收录
  • Scopus 收录

重铬酸钾和高锰酸钾电位落差法测定砂岩型铀矿氧化还原电位的探讨

Determination of Redox Potential of Sandstone-type Uranium Ore by Potential Drop Methods of Potassium Dichromate and Potassium Permanganate

  • 摘要: 氧化还原电位是一个体系中所有物质混合氧化还原电位的数量指标,反映了整个体系氧化还原能力的相对强弱,而砂岩型铀矿的氧化还原电位控制着铀等变价元素的地球化学行为,对准确圈出铀富集层位具有重要意义。电位落差法借助于氧化剂溶液测定样品的氧化还原容量,电位差的大小能准确反映出砂岩型铀矿样品所含还原组分的还原能力。本文以重铬酸钾和高锰酸钾作为氧化剂,探讨了应用这两种氧化剂的电位落差法测定砂岩型铀矿氧化还原电位(ΔEh)的特点。系统研究了两种方法溶液介质浓度、氧化剂浓度、平衡电位时间、样品浸泡时间和样品与氧化剂溶液的固液比对ΔEh测定的影响。按照两种方法最优条件测定8个砂岩型铀矿样品,重铬酸钾法ΔEh值在15~118mV之间,相对标准偏差为2.50%~7.44%;高锰酸钾法ΔEh值在45~89mV之间,相对标准偏差为0.89%~1.42%,两种方法在测量8个砂岩型铀矿样品ΔEh的相对水平方面具有一致性,相关系数为0.9882。研究表明重铬酸钾电位落差法的ΔEh更分散跨度更大,能更直观地看出样品间还原能力的差别;高锰酸钾电位落差法的ΔEh稳定性更好。两种电位落差法测量砂岩型铀矿的ΔEh数值可用于其氧化还原分带的划分。

     

    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND The redox potential is a quantitative indicator of the mixed redox potential of all substances in a system, which reflects the relative strength of the redox capacity of the whole system. It is of great significance to delineate the uranium enrichment horizon. The redox potential of sandstone-type uranium deposits controls the geochemical behavior of uranium and other variable valence elements, and is of great significance for accurately delineating uranium-enriched horizons. The potential difference method is used to measure the redox capacity of the sample by means of the oxidant solution, and the magnitude of the potential difference can accurately reflect the reducing ability of the reducing components in the sandstone-type uranium ore sample.
    OBJECTIVES To compare the two methods for the determination of the redox potential (ΔEh) of sandstone-type uranium ores.
    METHODS ΔEh of sandstone-type uranium ores was determined by two potential drop methods using potassium dichromate and potassium permanganate as oxidants. The effects of the solution medium concentration, oxidant concentration, equilibrium potential time, sample immersion time, and solid-liquid ratio of sample to oxidant solution on the determination of ΔEh were systematically studied. According to the optimal conditions of the two methods, 8 sandstone-type uranium samples were measured.
    RESULTS The ΔEh of the potassium dichromate method was between 15mV and 118mV, and the relative standard deviation was between 2.50% and 7.44%. The ΔEh of the potassium permanganate method was between 45mV and 89mV, with the relative standard deviation of 0.89%-1.42%. The two methods had significant consistency in determining the relative level of ΔEh of 8 sandstone-type uranium ore samples, and the correlation coefficient was 0.9882.
    CONCLUSIONS The ΔEh of the potassium dichromate potential drop method is more dispersed with a large range, and the difference in reducing ability between samples can be identified more intuitively. The ΔEh of the potassium permanganate potential drop method is more stable. The ΔEh values of sandstone-type uranium deposits measured by two potential drop methods can be used for the division of redox zoning.

     

/

返回文章
返回