• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • DOAJ 收录
  • Scopus 收录

蛇纹石物相X射线衍射定量分析精密度评估方法的探讨

Discussion on the Precision Evaluation Method of Serpentine Phase Quantitative Analysis by X-ray Diffraction

  • 摘要: 蛇纹石是一种重要的矿物材料和化工原料,广泛应用于化工、农业、建材、冶金及环保等领域,中国由于对蛇纹石矿开采品位要求较高,形成了较多的弃尾矿,造成了大量的浪费和环境污染。根据弃尾矿中蛇纹石的不同含量,进而生产不同的工业产品,可改善生态环境,为蛇纹石企业寻求到新的发展出路。这些工作的基础是能够对蛇纹石进行快速和精确的测定。目前蛇纹石矿石的测定方法采用行业标准《蛇纹石矿石分析方法》(HG/T 3575—2006)进行,其分析步骤繁琐,分析时间过长,现有的检测方法已不能满足市场和企业的急需,而长期以来利用X射线衍射进行的蛇纹石定量分析,其分析方法的精密度一直没有得到规范的量化控制,实验室之间的精密度比对也缺乏相应的依据。为进一步提高X射线衍射法检测蛇纹石矿物含量的水平,本文根据GB/T 6379.2—2004标准中的要求,首先通过挑选加配制共10个不同含量的样品,进行均匀性检验,当检测结果F实测值均小于F临界值,表明试验样品是均匀的,然后选择8家实验室使用检验后合格的样品进行精密度协作试验,对得到的测试结果进行格拉布斯检验和柯克伦检验,通过检验的数据才能参与精密度参数的计算,最终获得X射线衍射标准曲线法和K值法的精密度与含量之间的数学函数关系。实验结果表明:本次协作试验的数据,全部通过格拉布斯检验和柯克伦检验,均可参与精密度参数的计算,结果也侧面证明了不同实验室不同仪器测试的结果一致性较高。精密度参数的计算结果显示:在X射线衍射标准曲线法和K值法重复性限和再现性限数据中,含量最低的样品,其重复性限和再现性限也最小,验证了X射线衍射对物相定量分析的误差主要源自于样品的均匀性误差这一特征。证实了在所有影响X射线衍射定量分析结果的因素中,样品的均匀性是最关键的因素,而其他因素产生的影响可用改变测试条件等相应方法来克服。只要样品足够均匀,就能将定量分析的误差限定在可控范围内。本文针对蛇纹石物相定量分析方法精密度的研究,可为蛇纹石物相定量分析标准方法的建立和分析方法的评价及分析质量的监控等提供依据。

     

    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND Serpentine is an important group of minerals, widely used in the chemical and building industries, agriculture, metallurgy, environmental protection, and other fields. Due to the high requirements for the mining grade of serpentine ores in China, many abandoned tailings have been formed, resulting in a large amount of waste causing environmental pollution. According to the different content of serpentine in the waste tailings, different industrial products can be produced, which can improve the natural environment and diversify serpentine enterprises. These works are based on the ability to determine serpentine contents quickly and accurately. At present, the determination method of serpentine ores is based on the industry standard HG/T 3575—2006 Analysis Method of Serpentine Ores. The content of magnesium is measured first, and the content of serpentine mineral is obtained after conversion. The analysis steps are tedious, and the analysis time is long. The existing detection methods obviously cannot meet the urgent needs of the market and enterprises. For a long time, the precision of the quantitative analysis of serpentine by X-ray diffraction has not been controlled quantitatively. The precision comparison between laboratories also lacks a corresponding basis.
    OBJECTIVES It is urgent to improve the detection level of X-ray diffraction and further improve the detection technology of serpentine mineral content. The purpose of this study is to lay a foundation for the establishment of the standard method for the quantitative analysis of serpentine phase in the future and provide a basis for the evaluation of analytical methods and the monitoring of analytical quality.
    METHODS This study refers to the method widely used internationally to express precision with repeatability limit and reproducibility limit, and to judge the reliability of analysis results in practice. According to the requirements of GB/T 6379.2—2004 standard, 10 samples with different serpentine content are selected and prepared for uniformity test. The serpentine content ranges from 5.00% to 84.78%, which basically covers the content range of serpentine deposits in China, meeting the requirements of the research program. The purpose of the uniformity test is to reduce the error of quantitative analysis, especially in the case of low content, because the uniformity of the sample has a great impact on the accuracy of the test results. The measured value of Fmeasured is less than the critical value of Fcritical, indicating that the analyzed samples are uniform. Eight laboratories are selected to use the qualified samples for the precision collaborative test. According to the requirements of the quantitative limit and the optimal measurement range, and the results of the precision, accuracy and recovery test, the standard curve method has a small error, accurate test data, high recovery rate and stronger applicability for samples with serpentine mineral content of less than 20.00%. For high-content samples with serpentine mineral content of 20% or more, the parameters of the K value method all meet the requirements, considering the fast and convenient determination, it is more suitable for the application of the K value method. The laboratories participating in the collaborative test use the uniformly supplied analytical pure corundum reagent as the reference material, and use the X-ray diffraction standard curve method (provide the calibration curve) for samples with serpentine mineral < 20%, while use the X-ray diffraction K value method (provide K value) for samples with serpentine mineral ≥20% under the same test conditions. Only the data passing the test of Grubbs and Cochran can participate in the calculation of precision parameters, and the mathematical function relationship between the precision and content of X-ray diffraction standard curve method and K-value method is obtained.
    RESULTS The experimental results show that the critical value of Fcritical under 95% confidence is 3.50 for the collaborative test, while the measured value of Fmeasured after statistical calculation is less than 3.50, which proves that the 10 samples are relatively uniform and are qualified as the precision collaborative sample. Moreover, the data of the collaborative test are all less than 5% of the critical value, and all of them pass the Grubbs test and Cochran test. All of the data can be included in the calculation of precision parameters, which also proves the high consistency of the test results of different instruments in different laboratories.
    CONCLUSIONS The calculation results of precision parameters show that the precision parameters of X-ray diffraction standard curve method and K-value method are positively correlated with the content of serpentine minerals, that is, the higher the content of serpentine minerals, the greater the repeatability limit and reproducibility limit, and vice versa. The sample with the lowest content of serpentine has the lowest repeatability limit and reproducibility limit, which also verifies that the error of X-ray diffraction for phase quantitative analysis mainly comes from the uniformity error of the sample. It confirms that among all factors affecting the results of X-ray diffraction quantitative analysis, the homogeneity of the sample is the most critical factor, and the influence of other factors can be overcome by changing the test conditions and other corresponding methods. If the sample is uniform enough, the error of quantitative analysis can be controlled. The research on the precision of the quantitative analysis method of serpentine phase provides technical support and basis for the establishment of the standard method of the quantitative analysis of serpentine phase, the evaluation of the analysis method and the monitoring of the analysis quality in the future.

     

/

返回文章
返回