高浓度铬污染土壤总铬和六价铬分析方法及铬渣场污染分布研究

Analysis of Total Cr and Cr(Ⅵ) in Soils with High Chromium Contamination and Pollution Distribution of Chromium Residue Site

  • 摘要: 历史遗留铬渣场是土壤铬(Cr)污染的核心点源,其高浓度、高异质性铬污染土壤的总铬分析,存在前处理方法选择缺乏科学依据、X射线荧光光谱法(XRF)现场快速筛查总铬浓度方法适配程度不清等问题,制约了污染场地精准调查与修复。为明确高铬污染土壤中总铬测定前处理方法选择,构建高效精准的分级检测策略,本文以典型铬渣场为研究对象,对比了电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)分别采用敞开酸溶与封闭压力酸溶两种前处理方法测定总铬浓度的差异,结果表明敞开酸溶因Cr(Ⅵ)生成挥发性氯化铬酰(CrO2Cl2),导致总铬测定结果产生系统性误差,标准物质GBW07101测定结果的相对误差达−21.8%,而封闭压力酸溶的相对误差仅6.7%,为高铬污染土壤总铬定量的优选前处理方法。进而以封闭压力酸溶ICP-OES测定结果为基准,评估波长色散X射线荧光光谱法(WDXRF)和能量色散X射线荧光光谱法(EDXRF)对不同浓度总铬的定量性能,并表征场地总铬及Cr(Ⅵ)污染特征。研究揭示:①总铬浓度以4000 mg/kg为临界阈值,低于该值WDXRF定量准确性更优,高于该值EDXRF准确性更好;②靶区场地土壤总铬浓度为68 ~ 14833 mg/kg,呈渣场核心向外围梯度递减分布,核心区最高超标59倍,Cr(Ⅵ)最高浓度达3030.0 mg/kg,污染风险突出。本研究明确了高铬污染土壤分析的方法体系依据与适配条件,构建了分级检测流程,为同类型历史遗留铬渣场的污染管控与修复治理提供系统技术支撑。

     

    Abstract: Legacy chromium residue stockpiles act as critical point sources of soil chromium (Cr) contamination. For soils with high-level and highly heterogeneous chromium pollution, the analysis of total Cr faces several bottlenecks, including insufficient scientific support for selecting suitable pretreatment methods and ambiguous applicability of X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) for rapid on-site screening of total Cr concentrations, which hinders precise investigation and remediation of contaminated sites. To clarify the selection of pretreatment methods for total Cr measurement in highly chromium-contaminated soils and establish an efficient and accurate hierarchical detection strategy, this study took a typical legacy chromium residue stockpile as the research object. Two pretreatment methods, namely open acid digestion and closed pressure acid digestion, were compared via inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for total Cr quantification. The results demonstrated that open acid digestion produced volatile chromyl chloride (CrO2Cl2) from Cr(Ⅵ), leading to systematic error in total Cr measurements. The relative error of certified reference material GBW07101 reached −21.8% using open acid digestion, while only 6.7% for closed pressure acid digestion, confirming closed pressure acid digestion as the optimal pretreatment technique for accurate total Cr quantification in highly chromium-polluted soils. Furthermore, based on the benchmark data obtained from closed pressure acid digestion combined with ICP-OES, the quantitative performances of wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (WDXRF) and energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF) for total Cr at different concentration levels were evaluated, and the spatial distribution characteristics of total Cr and Cr(Ⅵ) across the site were characterized. The main findings are as follows: (1) 4000 mg/kg serves as the critical threshold of total Cr concentration. WDXRF delivers superior quantitative accuracy below this threshold, whereas EDXRF performs better at concentrations above 4000 mg/kg; (2) The total Cr concentrations of soil samples collected from the target site ranged from 68 to 14833 mg/kg, showing a gradient decreasing trend outward from the core of the residue stockpile. The total Cr content in core-area soils exceeded the standard limit by up to 59 times, and the maximum Cr(Ⅵ) concentration was 3030.0 mg/kg, posing prominent environmental pollution risks. This study clarifies the theoretical basis and applicable conditions of analytical methods for highly chromium-contaminated soils and establishes a hierarchical detection workflow, providing systematic technical support for pollution control and remediation of similar legacy chromium residue stockpiles.

     

/

返回文章
返回